Political Polarization and Platform Migration:: A Study of Parler and Twitter Usage by United States of America Congress Members

Jacqueline M. Otala, Gillian Kurtic, Isabella Grasso, Yu Liu, Jeanna Neefe Matthews, Golshan Madraki
{"title":"Political Polarization and Platform Migration:: A Study of Parler and Twitter Usage by United States of America Congress Members","authors":"Jacqueline M. Otala, Gillian Kurtic, Isabella Grasso, Yu Liu, Jeanna Neefe Matthews, Golshan Madraki","doi":"10.1145/3442442.3452305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Growing dissatisfaction with platform governance decisions at major social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram has led to a number of substantial efforts, originating both on the political right and the political left, to shift to new platforms. In this paper, we examine one of the most impactful of these platform migration efforts, a recent effort primarily on the political right to shift from Twitter to Parler in response to Twitter's increased efforts to flag misinformation in the lead up to the 2020 election in the US. As a case study, we analyze the usage of Parler by all members of the United States Congress and compare that to their usage of Twitter. Even though usage of Parler, even at its peak, was only a small percentage of Twitter usage, Parler usage has been impactful. Specifically, it was linked to the planning of the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol building. Going forward, Parler itself may not have a large and lasting impact, but it offers important lessons about the relationship between political polarization, platform migration, and the real-world political impacts of platform governance decisions and the splintering of our media landscape.","PeriodicalId":129420,"journal":{"name":"Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3442442.3452305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Growing dissatisfaction with platform governance decisions at major social media platforms like Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram has led to a number of substantial efforts, originating both on the political right and the political left, to shift to new platforms. In this paper, we examine one of the most impactful of these platform migration efforts, a recent effort primarily on the political right to shift from Twitter to Parler in response to Twitter's increased efforts to flag misinformation in the lead up to the 2020 election in the US. As a case study, we analyze the usage of Parler by all members of the United States Congress and compare that to their usage of Twitter. Even though usage of Parler, even at its peak, was only a small percentage of Twitter usage, Parler usage has been impactful. Specifically, it was linked to the planning of the January 6, 2021 attack on the United States Capitol building. Going forward, Parler itself may not have a large and lasting impact, but it offers important lessons about the relationship between political polarization, platform migration, and the real-world political impacts of platform governance decisions and the splintering of our media landscape.
政治两极分化和平台迁移:美国国会议员使用Parler和Twitter的研究
对主要社交媒体平台(如Twitter、Facebook和Instagram)的平台治理决策日益不满,导致政治右翼和政治左翼都做出了大量努力,转向新的平台。在本文中,我们研究了这些平台迁移努力中最具影响力的一个,最近的一项努力主要是在政治权利上从Twitter转向Parler,以回应Twitter在2020年美国大选之前加大了对错误信息的标记力度。作为一个案例研究,我们分析了美国国会所有成员对Parler的使用情况,并将其与他们对Twitter的使用情况进行了比较。尽管Parler的使用,即使在其高峰期,也只占Twitter使用的一小部分,但Parler的使用已经产生了影响。具体来说,它与2021年1月6日对美国国会大厦的袭击计划有关。展望未来,Parler本身可能不会产生巨大而持久的影响,但它为政治两极分化、平台迁移、平台治理决策对现实世界的政治影响以及媒体格局的分裂之间的关系提供了重要的经验教训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信