Comparison between Gelled Culture and Temporary Immersion System for Somatic Embryos Proliferation of Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)

Reflini Reflini, Plant Production, A. Sahara
{"title":"Comparison between Gelled Culture and Temporary Immersion System for Somatic Embryos Proliferation of Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.)","authors":"Reflini Reflini, Plant Production, A. Sahara","doi":"10.18178/joaat.6.4.276-280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oil palm in vitro propagation was developed using both solid (gelled) and liquid media. Many restrictive factors remain in oil palm in vitro propagation such as long culture duration, a high degree of genotype dependence, somaclonal variation, low rate of somatic embryogenesis and also followed by low rate of somatic embryos proliferation. Therefore, it is necessary to find alternative ways to increase somatic embryo proliferation to obtain more shoots without compromising the quality of in vitro plantlets. In this study, somatic embryos proliferation and germination were evaluated through Temporary Immersion System (TIS) in comparison with gelled culture. Globular primary somatic embryos were selected and cultured in TIS and gelled culture. After six months of culture, somatic embryos in TIS were multiplied and germinated on solid medium. Parameters observed were fresh weight and number of somatic embryos and shoots production amount. The results shown that TIS produced more clumps (186 clumps) and fresh weight (12.79g) of somatic embryos compared to gelled culture (81 clumps; 3.60 g). TIS also produced more shoots and therefore resulting in more plantlets. The quality of plantlets derived from TIS was not different from gelled culture.","PeriodicalId":222254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Agricultural Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18178/joaat.6.4.276-280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oil palm in vitro propagation was developed using both solid (gelled) and liquid media. Many restrictive factors remain in oil palm in vitro propagation such as long culture duration, a high degree of genotype dependence, somaclonal variation, low rate of somatic embryogenesis and also followed by low rate of somatic embryos proliferation. Therefore, it is necessary to find alternative ways to increase somatic embryo proliferation to obtain more shoots without compromising the quality of in vitro plantlets. In this study, somatic embryos proliferation and germination were evaluated through Temporary Immersion System (TIS) in comparison with gelled culture. Globular primary somatic embryos were selected and cultured in TIS and gelled culture. After six months of culture, somatic embryos in TIS were multiplied and germinated on solid medium. Parameters observed were fresh weight and number of somatic embryos and shoots production amount. The results shown that TIS produced more clumps (186 clumps) and fresh weight (12.79g) of somatic embryos compared to gelled culture (81 clumps; 3.60 g). TIS also produced more shoots and therefore resulting in more plantlets. The quality of plantlets derived from TIS was not different from gelled culture.
胶凝培养与暂浸培养对油棕体细胞胚增殖的影响
采用固体(凝胶)和液体培养基进行油棕离体繁殖。油棕体外繁殖存在培养时间长、基因型依赖程度高、体细胞无性系变异、体胚发生率低、体胚增殖率低等制约因素。因此,有必要寻找增加体细胞胚增殖的替代方法,以获得更多的芽,而不影响离体植株的质量。在本研究中,通过暂时浸泡系统(TIS)和凝胶培养比较了体细胞胚的增殖和萌发。选择球状初代体细胞胚,分别在TIS和凝胶培养中培养。培养6个月后,体胚在TIS中增殖并在固体培养基上萌发。观察的参数为鲜重、体胚数和芽产量。结果表明,与凝胶培养(81个)相比,TIS培养的体胚团数更多(186个),鲜重(12.79g);3.60 g)。TIS还产生了更多的芽,因此产生了更多的植株。从TIS中获得的植株质量与凝胶培养没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信