{"title":"Lost and found: an avant-garde trajectory into the audiovisual essay","authors":"D. de Bruyn","doi":"10.1080/25741136.2021.1832769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article dissects the audiovisual essay Found Found Found (de Bruyn [2014]. “Found Found Found” NECSUS: Autumn, 2014. https://necsus-ejms.org/found-found-found/). Through a study of its formalist influences and strategies it is argued that it is possible to arrive at the audiovisual essay as a creative research methodology from a different practice trajectory. The originating point is the avant-garde split documented in Peter Wollen’s Two Avant-gardes (Wollen 1982 [1975]. “The two avant-gardes.” In Readings and Writings: Semiotic Counter Strategies, 92–114. London: Verso.), which articulated a formalist avant-garde, focusing on perceptual processes, as utopian in its extreme dismissal of the signified, as non-narrative and unreadable as political discourse. Vilém Flusser’s ‘technical image’ is enlisted to place such practice into a productive relationship with the audiovisual essay. This formalist cinema has already been re-read through the digital turn as producing forms of traumatic memory (de Bruyn [2014]. The Performance of Trauma in Moving Image Art. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.) and performing the formalist methods of surveillance technology (de Bruyn 2014. “Structuralist Film and the Birth of Surveillance: The 2013 Alternativa Film/Video Festival.” Senses of Cinema 70 March 2014: http://sensesofcinema.com/2014/festival-reports/structuralist-film-and-the-birth-of-surveillance-the-2013-alternativa-filmvideo-festival/.).","PeriodicalId":206409,"journal":{"name":"Media Practice and Education","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media Practice and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/25741136.2021.1832769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article dissects the audiovisual essay Found Found Found (de Bruyn [2014]. “Found Found Found” NECSUS: Autumn, 2014. https://necsus-ejms.org/found-found-found/). Through a study of its formalist influences and strategies it is argued that it is possible to arrive at the audiovisual essay as a creative research methodology from a different practice trajectory. The originating point is the avant-garde split documented in Peter Wollen’s Two Avant-gardes (Wollen 1982 [1975]. “The two avant-gardes.” In Readings and Writings: Semiotic Counter Strategies, 92–114. London: Verso.), which articulated a formalist avant-garde, focusing on perceptual processes, as utopian in its extreme dismissal of the signified, as non-narrative and unreadable as political discourse. Vilém Flusser’s ‘technical image’ is enlisted to place such practice into a productive relationship with the audiovisual essay. This formalist cinema has already been re-read through the digital turn as producing forms of traumatic memory (de Bruyn [2014]. The Performance of Trauma in Moving Image Art. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.) and performing the formalist methods of surveillance technology (de Bruyn 2014. “Structuralist Film and the Birth of Surveillance: The 2013 Alternativa Film/Video Festival.” Senses of Cinema 70 March 2014: http://sensesofcinema.com/2014/festival-reports/structuralist-film-and-the-birth-of-surveillance-the-2013-alternativa-filmvideo-festival/.).