THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Matronillo Martin
{"title":"THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SCHOOL-BASED MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS","authors":"Matronillo Martin","doi":"10.37134/AJATEL.VOL9.NO1.5.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was intended to evaluate the implementation of School-Based Management (SBM) in Alfonso Lista District 1 and District 2, Division of Ifugao through formative evaluation. The Stufflebeam’s Context, Input and Process (CIP) model was used to evaluate the implementation of SBM. Mixed Methods of Research (MMR) design was utilized. Triangulation of data through the use of data analysis, questionnaires, face-to-face interviews and focus group discussions (FGD) were employed. Mean rating and thematic approach were used to determine the extent of SBM and elaborated based on themes. The results showed that there was a moderate attainment of school objectives and the operational aspects of SBM were not fully implemented by the school heads. Results of the study showed that the strengths of the implementation are categorized in two discrete yet dominating themes: the value of cooperation and motivation; and the worth of collaboration and delegation. Correspondingly, the two major breakdowns of the communal description as regards the weaknesses of the implementation which includes the poor enactment of transparency and low value of support mechanism.  With regard to the remedial measures on issues or problems, three underlying and dominant themes were revealed: consultative meeting, administrative protocol and open communication and decision making as the heart of the organization. A policy implication is then put forward since SBM accounts for four major principles or domains. This calls for the decentralization of authority which originally comes from the school head who solely and directly implements SBM to the operation relegated to teachers managing their respective domains such as: leadership and governance; curriculum and learning; accountability and continuous improvement; and management of resources based on their qualifications or skills. In doing such, devolution or a dispersed authority builds on teachers who are more directly involved with the beneficiaries like the pupils and their parents.","PeriodicalId":298189,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal Of Assessment In Teaching And Learning","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal Of Assessment In Teaching And Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37134/AJATEL.VOL9.NO1.5.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

This study was intended to evaluate the implementation of School-Based Management (SBM) in Alfonso Lista District 1 and District 2, Division of Ifugao through formative evaluation. The Stufflebeam’s Context, Input and Process (CIP) model was used to evaluate the implementation of SBM. Mixed Methods of Research (MMR) design was utilized. Triangulation of data through the use of data analysis, questionnaires, face-to-face interviews and focus group discussions (FGD) were employed. Mean rating and thematic approach were used to determine the extent of SBM and elaborated based on themes. The results showed that there was a moderate attainment of school objectives and the operational aspects of SBM were not fully implemented by the school heads. Results of the study showed that the strengths of the implementation are categorized in two discrete yet dominating themes: the value of cooperation and motivation; and the worth of collaboration and delegation. Correspondingly, the two major breakdowns of the communal description as regards the weaknesses of the implementation which includes the poor enactment of transparency and low value of support mechanism.  With regard to the remedial measures on issues or problems, three underlying and dominant themes were revealed: consultative meeting, administrative protocol and open communication and decision making as the heart of the organization. A policy implication is then put forward since SBM accounts for four major principles or domains. This calls for the decentralization of authority which originally comes from the school head who solely and directly implements SBM to the operation relegated to teachers managing their respective domains such as: leadership and governance; curriculum and learning; accountability and continuous improvement; and management of resources based on their qualifications or skills. In doing such, devolution or a dispersed authority builds on teachers who are more directly involved with the beneficiaries like the pupils and their parents.
公立小学校本管理的实施
本研究旨在通过形成性评价的方法,对伊富高区阿方索利斯塔一区和二区实施校本管理的情况进行评价。采用Stufflebeam的上下文、输入和过程(CIP)模型来评估SBM的实施情况。采用混合研究方法(MMR)设计。通过使用数据分析、问卷调查、面对面访谈和焦点小组讨论(FGD)对数据进行三角测量。采用平均评分法和主题法确定SBM的程度,并根据主题进行阐述。结果显示,学校目标的达成程度适中,而学校校长并没有全面推行校本管理的运作。研究结果表明,实施的优势分为两个独立但占主导地位的主题:合作和动机的价值;以及合作和授权的价值。相应的,公共描述在执行方面的两个主要缺陷包括透明度制定差和支持机制价值低。关于问题或问题的补救措施,揭示了三个基本和主要的主题:协商会议、行政礼仪和作为本组织核心的公开沟通和决策。由于SBM包含四个主要原则或领域,因此提出了政策含义。这就要求将原本由校长单独直接实施校本管理的权力下放到教师管理各自领域的操作,如:领导和治理;课程与学习;问责制和持续改进;以及根据他们的资格或技能来管理资源。在这样做的过程中,权力下放或分散的权力建立在教师的基础上,教师更直接地与学生及其家长等受益者打交道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信