RumorSleuth: Joint Detection of Rumor Veracity and User Stance

Mohammad Raihanul Islam, S. Muthiah, Naren Ramakrishnan
{"title":"RumorSleuth: Joint Detection of Rumor Veracity and User Stance","authors":"Mohammad Raihanul Islam, S. Muthiah, Naren Ramakrishnan","doi":"10.1145/3341161.3342916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The penetration of social media has had deep and far-reaching consequences in information production and consumption. Widespread use of social media platforms has engendered malicious users and attention seekers to spread rumors and fake news. This trend is particularly evident in various microblogging platforms where news becomes viral in a matter of hours and can lead to mass panic and confusion. One intriguing fact regarding rumors and fake news is that very often rumor stories prompt users to adopt different stances about the rumor posts. Understanding user stances in rumor posts is thus very important to identify the veracity of the underlying content. While rumor veracity and stance detection have been viewed as disjoint tasks we demonstrate here how jointly learning both of them can be fruitful. In this paper, we propose RumorSleuth, a multitask deep learning model which can leverage both the textual information and user profile information to jointly identify the veracity of a rumor along with users' stances. Tests on two publicly available rumor datasets demonstrate that RumorSleuth outperforms current state-of-the-art models and achieves up to 14% performance gain in rumor veracity classification and around 6% improvement in user stance classification.","PeriodicalId":403360,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3341161.3342916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The penetration of social media has had deep and far-reaching consequences in information production and consumption. Widespread use of social media platforms has engendered malicious users and attention seekers to spread rumors and fake news. This trend is particularly evident in various microblogging platforms where news becomes viral in a matter of hours and can lead to mass panic and confusion. One intriguing fact regarding rumors and fake news is that very often rumor stories prompt users to adopt different stances about the rumor posts. Understanding user stances in rumor posts is thus very important to identify the veracity of the underlying content. While rumor veracity and stance detection have been viewed as disjoint tasks we demonstrate here how jointly learning both of them can be fruitful. In this paper, we propose RumorSleuth, a multitask deep learning model which can leverage both the textual information and user profile information to jointly identify the veracity of a rumor along with users' stances. Tests on two publicly available rumor datasets demonstrate that RumorSleuth outperforms current state-of-the-art models and achieves up to 14% performance gain in rumor veracity classification and around 6% improvement in user stance classification.
谣言侦探:谣言真实性和用户立场的联合检测
社交媒体的渗透对信息生产和消费产生了深刻而深远的影响。社交媒体平台的广泛使用导致恶意用户和寻求关注者传播谣言和假新闻。这种趋势在各种微博平台上尤为明显,在这些平台上,新闻在几小时内就会迅速传播,并可能导致大规模的恐慌和混乱。关于谣言和假新闻,一个有趣的事实是,谣言故事往往会促使用户对谣言帖子采取不同的立场。因此,了解谣言帖子中的用户立场对于识别潜在内容的真实性非常重要。虽然谣言真实性和姿态检测被视为互不相干的任务,但我们在这里展示了如何共同学习这两个任务是富有成效的。在本文中,我们提出了一个多任务深度学习模型RumorSleuth,它可以利用文本信息和用户档案信息来共同识别谣言的真实性以及用户的立场。在两个公开可用的谣言数据集上的测试表明,RumorSleuth优于当前最先进的模型,在谣言真实性分类方面的性能提高了14%,在用户立场分类方面的性能提高了6%左右。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信