UKRAINIANS IN THE SYSTEM OF MANNING THE ARMED FORCES OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE BEFORE THE FIRST WORLD WAR: MILITARY AND POLITICAL ASPECT

Antonina Skydanova
{"title":"UKRAINIANS IN THE SYSTEM OF MANNING THE ARMED FORCES OF THE RUSSIAN EMPIRE BEFORE THE FIRST WORLD WAR: MILITARY AND POLITICAL ASPECT","authors":"Antonina Skydanova","doi":"10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-115-122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author is focused on how changes in the military and political sphere of the late Russian empire have affected the number, character and significance of the military service of Ukrainians in the Imperial Army. The manning of the Armed Forces of the Russian Empire from the reform of 1874 to the First World War was balancing between the two poles: the creation of conditions for rapid deployment of the army and the consideration of the Empires state-building priorities. Eventually, the second pole turned out to be dominant and became the main for the manning of troops. The Empire Army turned into an instrument and at the same time a mirror of domestic policy. The place of a nation in the structure of the Armed Forces was a projection of its status in the Empire and showed probable prospects for its future. In the last decades of the XIX century the practice of restrictions and exclusion from the military service was finally established to those nations who the Empire wanted to colonize or keep under the rule. Keeping under the rule was guaranteed by placing on the territories of their residence not the multinational contingent of troops (Grand Duchy of Finland, former Kingdom of Poland, Caucasus, the nations of Siberia, etc.). These troops, as everywhere in the Empire, were 75 percent consisted of so-called «Russian Nation». The «Russian Nation» as an intellectual and ideological construction included Ukrainians, Russians and Belarusians. The idea of the «three-part Russian Nation» centrality as the «Russian Imperial Nation» became predominant for the rule of Alexander III and Nicholas II. This meant that Ukrainians completely became hostages of the Empire in the military and political sense. At the beginning of XX century Ukraine was intensively used as a conscription pool district. In 1907, 22,5% of new recruits were Ukrainians. It should be noted that the qualification of Ukrainians as part of the «Russian Nation» and military practices with them have provided potential opportunities for the deployment of processes that were in total opposition to the strategic ideas of the Russian Empire. Significant part of Ukrainians in military units, reduced terms of military service, and involvement compatriots in teaching of new recruits gave a good chance to keep local identity among soldiers. Even at the beginning of the 20th century, the Russian Imperial army still had poor chances to become a «school of the nation» according to the German model, first of all because of the undeveloped system of school education – the basis for the education of the citizens. In the army soldiers were memorizing titles, drill and combat commands, responsibilities in Russian, seared the oath of loyalty to the Emperor. This was not enough for radical changes in their identity. With the change of circumstances in 1917, many Ukrainian soldiers of the Imperial Army had already wanted to create separate Ukrainian military units and quickly joined the Ukrainian revolutionary movement, becoming actors of the collapse of the Russian Empire.","PeriodicalId":229424,"journal":{"name":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovì zapiski Nacìonalʹnogo unìversitetu \"Ostrozʹka akademìâ\". Serìâ Ìstoričnì nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25264/2409-6806-2023-34-115-122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author is focused on how changes in the military and political sphere of the late Russian empire have affected the number, character and significance of the military service of Ukrainians in the Imperial Army. The manning of the Armed Forces of the Russian Empire from the reform of 1874 to the First World War was balancing between the two poles: the creation of conditions for rapid deployment of the army and the consideration of the Empires state-building priorities. Eventually, the second pole turned out to be dominant and became the main for the manning of troops. The Empire Army turned into an instrument and at the same time a mirror of domestic policy. The place of a nation in the structure of the Armed Forces was a projection of its status in the Empire and showed probable prospects for its future. In the last decades of the XIX century the practice of restrictions and exclusion from the military service was finally established to those nations who the Empire wanted to colonize or keep under the rule. Keeping under the rule was guaranteed by placing on the territories of their residence not the multinational contingent of troops (Grand Duchy of Finland, former Kingdom of Poland, Caucasus, the nations of Siberia, etc.). These troops, as everywhere in the Empire, were 75 percent consisted of so-called «Russian Nation». The «Russian Nation» as an intellectual and ideological construction included Ukrainians, Russians and Belarusians. The idea of the «three-part Russian Nation» centrality as the «Russian Imperial Nation» became predominant for the rule of Alexander III and Nicholas II. This meant that Ukrainians completely became hostages of the Empire in the military and political sense. At the beginning of XX century Ukraine was intensively used as a conscription pool district. In 1907, 22,5% of new recruits were Ukrainians. It should be noted that the qualification of Ukrainians as part of the «Russian Nation» and military practices with them have provided potential opportunities for the deployment of processes that were in total opposition to the strategic ideas of the Russian Empire. Significant part of Ukrainians in military units, reduced terms of military service, and involvement compatriots in teaching of new recruits gave a good chance to keep local identity among soldiers. Even at the beginning of the 20th century, the Russian Imperial army still had poor chances to become a «school of the nation» according to the German model, first of all because of the undeveloped system of school education – the basis for the education of the citizens. In the army soldiers were memorizing titles, drill and combat commands, responsibilities in Russian, seared the oath of loyalty to the Emperor. This was not enough for radical changes in their identity. With the change of circumstances in 1917, many Ukrainian soldiers of the Imperial Army had already wanted to create separate Ukrainian military units and quickly joined the Ukrainian revolutionary movement, becoming actors of the collapse of the Russian Empire.
第一次世界大战前俄罗斯帝国武装部队的乌克兰人:军事和政治方面
作者关注的是俄罗斯帝国晚期军事和政治领域的变化如何影响了乌克兰人在帝国军队中服兵役的数量、特征和意义。从1874年的改革到第一次世界大战,俄罗斯帝国武装部队的人员配备在两极之间保持平衡:为军队的快速部署创造条件和考虑帝国国家建设的优先事项。最终,第二根杆子占据了主导地位,成为军队的主要人员配备。帝国军队变成了一种工具,同时也是国内政策的一面镜子。一个国家在武装部队结构中的地位是其在帝国中的地位的投射,并显示了其未来的可能前景。在十九世纪的最后几十年里,对那些帝国想要殖民或统治的国家,最终确立了限制和排斥服兵役的做法。在他们居住的领土上放置多国部队(芬兰大公国,前波兰王国,高加索地区,西伯利亚国家等),以保证遵守规则。这些军队和帝国的其他地方一样,75%是由所谓的“俄罗斯民族”组成的。“俄罗斯民族”作为一个智力和意识形态的建构包括乌克兰人、俄罗斯人和白俄罗斯人。在亚历山大三世和尼古拉二世统治时期,“三部分俄罗斯民族”作为“俄罗斯帝国民族”的中心思想占据了主导地位。这意味着乌克兰人在军事和政治意义上完全成为了帝国的人质二十世纪初,乌克兰被集中用作征兵区。1907年,22.5%的新兵是乌克兰人。应该指出的是,乌克兰人作为“俄罗斯民族”的一部分的资格及其军事实践为部署完全反对俄罗斯帝国战略思想的进程提供了潜在的机会。很大一部分乌克兰人在军队中服役,服役期缩短,以及让乌克兰同胞参与到新兵的教学中来,这些都给士兵们提供了保持本土身份的好机会。即使在20世纪初,俄罗斯帝国军队仍然没有机会按照德国模式成为“国家学校”,首先是因为学校教育系统不发达-公民教育的基础。在军队里,士兵们正在用俄语背诵头衔、操练和战斗命令、职责,并宣读效忠皇帝的誓言。这还不足以彻底改变他们的身份。1917年,随着形势的变化,许多帝国军队的乌克兰士兵已经想要建立独立的乌克兰军队,并迅速加入了乌克兰革命运动,成为俄罗斯帝国崩溃的参与者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信