Assumpsit in lieu of debt

J. Baker
{"title":"Assumpsit in lieu of debt","authors":"J. Baker","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198847809.003.0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Once it was established that the action of assumpsit would lie for nonfeasance, thoughts turned to using it for the non-payment of debts. This would enable the action of debt to be avoided, and thus prevent debtors from escaping their debts by waging law. The development was accepted by the King’s Bench in 1532, but resisted for over sixty years by the Common Pleas, which regarded wager of law as a right worth preserving. This chapter shows the arguments that were advanced on both sides, how the clash between the courts came to a head with the creation of the Exchequer Chamber in 1585, with jurisdiction to reverse King’s Bench judgments, and how the dispute was finally ended (by the barest majority) in Slade’s Case (1602). The 1602 decision was that every debt included an implied undertaking on which assumpsit would lie. This effectively put an end to wager of law.","PeriodicalId":197105,"journal":{"name":"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baker and Milsom Sources of English Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198847809.003.0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Once it was established that the action of assumpsit would lie for nonfeasance, thoughts turned to using it for the non-payment of debts. This would enable the action of debt to be avoided, and thus prevent debtors from escaping their debts by waging law. The development was accepted by the King’s Bench in 1532, but resisted for over sixty years by the Common Pleas, which regarded wager of law as a right worth preserving. This chapter shows the arguments that were advanced on both sides, how the clash between the courts came to a head with the creation of the Exchequer Chamber in 1585, with jurisdiction to reverse King’s Bench judgments, and how the dispute was finally ended (by the barest majority) in Slade’s Case (1602). The 1602 decision was that every debt included an implied undertaking on which assumpsit would lie. This effectively put an end to wager of law.
以假设代替债务
一旦假设行为被确定为不作为行为,人们就会转而将其用于不偿还债务。这将使债务行动得以避免,从而防止债务人通过发动法律来逃避债务。这一发展在1532年得到了国王御前庭的认可,但在长达60多年的时间里遭到了普通上诉法院的抵制,后者认为法律赌博是一项值得保留的权利。本章展示了双方的争论,法院之间的冲突如何随着1585年财政部的成立而达到顶峰,拥有推翻国王法官判决的管辖权,以及争论如何最终在斯莱德案(1602)中(以微弱多数)结束。1602年的决定是,每笔债务都包含一项隐含的承诺,而假设是存在的。这有效地杜绝了法律赌博。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信