Inverse Distance Weighting as an alternative interpolation method to create radiometric maps of natural radionuclide concentrations using QGIS

R. le Roux, Susan Henrico, J. Bezuidenhout, Ivan Henrico
{"title":"Inverse Distance Weighting as an alternative interpolation method to create radiometric maps of natural radionuclide concentrations using QGIS","authors":"R. le Roux, Susan Henrico, J. Bezuidenhout, Ivan Henrico","doi":"10.5194/ica-proc-5-10-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. A previous study by the authors illustrated the distribution of naturally occurring radionuclides, i.e., potassium (K40), thorium (Th232), and uranium (U238), in the sediment of the Berg River estuary. The study also described the Delta Underwater Gamma detection System (DUGS) and its usage to measure the concentrations of these natural radionuclides. It also proposed a novel radiometric mapping technique with QGIS and, more importantly, highlighted the geospatial process through Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) to create radiometric maps. The present study used the same data and a similar design but proposed the use of the Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation method in QGIS to display natural radionuclide concentrations. The radiometric maps created in the previous study using the KDE technique created smooth and visually attractive maps. However, the IDW method is an exact interpolation method that predicts a value at a sampling location that is identical to the observed value. This is a requirement for the analysis of natural radionuclide concentrations in sediments. However, the effectiveness of the interpolation methods was evaluated using SPSS statistics software. First, probability-probability (P-P) plots were produced for each interpolation method. Secondly, descriptive regression statistics, including 'goodness-of-fit', Analysis-of-Variance (ANOVA), coefficients, and residuals were evaluated for both the IDW and KDE interpolation methods. This was done to assess which method was more effective for calculating the radionuclide concentrations (actual vs predicted values) in the Berg River area. The results showed that both methods experienced problems to predict unknown values. However, IDW consistently performed better than KDE across most of the interpolation tests. Natural radionuclides are useful predictors to track sedimentation and the results of this paper can serve as a benchmark for future work in tidal and non-tidal coastal environments.\n","PeriodicalId":233935,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the ICA","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the ICA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-proc-5-10-2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. A previous study by the authors illustrated the distribution of naturally occurring radionuclides, i.e., potassium (K40), thorium (Th232), and uranium (U238), in the sediment of the Berg River estuary. The study also described the Delta Underwater Gamma detection System (DUGS) and its usage to measure the concentrations of these natural radionuclides. It also proposed a novel radiometric mapping technique with QGIS and, more importantly, highlighted the geospatial process through Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) to create radiometric maps. The present study used the same data and a similar design but proposed the use of the Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation method in QGIS to display natural radionuclide concentrations. The radiometric maps created in the previous study using the KDE technique created smooth and visually attractive maps. However, the IDW method is an exact interpolation method that predicts a value at a sampling location that is identical to the observed value. This is a requirement for the analysis of natural radionuclide concentrations in sediments. However, the effectiveness of the interpolation methods was evaluated using SPSS statistics software. First, probability-probability (P-P) plots were produced for each interpolation method. Secondly, descriptive regression statistics, including 'goodness-of-fit', Analysis-of-Variance (ANOVA), coefficients, and residuals were evaluated for both the IDW and KDE interpolation methods. This was done to assess which method was more effective for calculating the radionuclide concentrations (actual vs predicted values) in the Berg River area. The results showed that both methods experienced problems to predict unknown values. However, IDW consistently performed better than KDE across most of the interpolation tests. Natural radionuclides are useful predictors to track sedimentation and the results of this paper can serve as a benchmark for future work in tidal and non-tidal coastal environments.
逆距离加权作为一种替代插值方法,利用QGIS创建天然放射性核素浓度的辐射测量图
摘要作者先前的一项研究表明,在贝格河河口的沉积物中,天然存在的放射性核素,即钾(K40)、钍(Th232)和铀(U238)的分布。该研究还介绍了Delta水下伽马探测系统(DUGS)及其用于测量这些天然放射性核素浓度的用途。本文还提出了一种新的基于QGIS的辐射制图技术,更重要的是,强调了通过核密度估计(KDE)创建辐射地图的地理空间过程。本研究使用相同的数据和类似的设计,但提出使用QGIS中的逆距离加权(IDW)插值方法来显示天然放射性核素浓度。在之前的研究中使用KDE技术创建的辐射测量图创建了平滑且具有视觉吸引力的地图。然而,IDW方法是一种精确插值方法,它在采样位置预测与观测值相同的值。这是分析沉积物中天然放射性核素浓度的要求。然而,使用SPSS统计软件对插值方法的有效性进行了评估。首先,为每种插值方法生成概率-概率(P-P)图。其次,对IDW和KDE插值方法进行描述性回归统计,包括“拟合优度”、方差分析(ANOVA)、系数和残差评估。这样做是为了评估哪种方法更有效地计算贝格河地区的放射性核素浓度(实际值与预测值)。结果表明,两种方法在预测未知值时都存在问题。然而,在大多数插值测试中,IDW始终比KDE表现得更好。天然放射性核素是跟踪沉积的有用预测因子,本文的结果可以作为未来在潮汐和非潮汐海岸环境中工作的基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信