Problems of Serving Compulsory Sentences Medical Measures Related to with Punishments Without Isolation from Society

A. Savin
{"title":"Problems of Serving Compulsory Sentences Medical Measures Related to with Punishments Without Isolation from Society","authors":"A. Savin","doi":"10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-114-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. Given that mental illnesses, as it is commonly believed, are negative factors in the development of society, the state takes not inconclusive steps to contain such diseases and at the same time gets rid of already di-agnosed cases by applying various methods of treatment and prevention. Taking into account that every year measures of criminal-legal influence without isolation from society are prescribed in more than 70 % of cases of convictions, the question of combining them with the treatment of persons diagnosed with mental illness is simply necessary. In the scientific community, it has been repeatedly discussed and the conclusions were approximately the same that the person committing the crime is more likely to have signs of \"deviant\" behavior, which indicates that it is necessary to at least diagnose it. As has been repeatedly discussed and, in fact, has become an axiom – the presence of a mental illness in a person increases the likelihood of committing an illegal act. The purpose of the study is to form scientific ideas about the processes of combining medical coercive measures with non-isolation punishments. Objectives: to study the provisions of judicial practice; to identify the problems of correlation of medical measures with punishments without isolation from society and their implementation; to formulate proposals to resolve these legal gaps. Methodology. In the process of working on the research, both general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis) and methods of legal science (formal legal, comparative legal) were used. The results of the study are a proposal to significantly supplement the theory of the institution of compulsory medical measures in particular and criminal law measures in general. Conclusions. The conducted research allowed us to assert that it is necessary to impose a duty on a convicted person, if there are sufficient grounds, to undergo treatment for a mental illness. In addition, it is necessary to introduce responsibility in the criminal law for evading the performance of such a duty, while at the same time designating the subject of control over the performance.","PeriodicalId":359562,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2021-11-5-114-129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Relevance. Given that mental illnesses, as it is commonly believed, are negative factors in the development of society, the state takes not inconclusive steps to contain such diseases and at the same time gets rid of already di-agnosed cases by applying various methods of treatment and prevention. Taking into account that every year measures of criminal-legal influence without isolation from society are prescribed in more than 70 % of cases of convictions, the question of combining them with the treatment of persons diagnosed with mental illness is simply necessary. In the scientific community, it has been repeatedly discussed and the conclusions were approximately the same that the person committing the crime is more likely to have signs of "deviant" behavior, which indicates that it is necessary to at least diagnose it. As has been repeatedly discussed and, in fact, has become an axiom – the presence of a mental illness in a person increases the likelihood of committing an illegal act. The purpose of the study is to form scientific ideas about the processes of combining medical coercive measures with non-isolation punishments. Objectives: to study the provisions of judicial practice; to identify the problems of correlation of medical measures with punishments without isolation from society and their implementation; to formulate proposals to resolve these legal gaps. Methodology. In the process of working on the research, both general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis) and methods of legal science (formal legal, comparative legal) were used. The results of the study are a proposal to significantly supplement the theory of the institution of compulsory medical measures in particular and criminal law measures in general. Conclusions. The conducted research allowed us to assert that it is necessary to impose a duty on a convicted person, if there are sufficient grounds, to undergo treatment for a mental illness. In addition, it is necessary to introduce responsibility in the criminal law for evading the performance of such a duty, while at the same time designating the subject of control over the performance.
强制服刑医疗措施与不与社会隔离的刑罚相关的问题
的相关性。鉴于人们普遍认为精神疾病是社会发展的消极因素,国家采取了有力的措施来控制这类疾病,同时通过采用各种治疗和预防方法来消除已经诊断出的病例。考虑到每年在70%以上的定罪案件中都规定了不与社会隔离的刑事法律影响措施,将这些措施与对被诊断患有精神疾病的人的治疗结合起来的问题是完全必要的。在科学界,这个问题被反复讨论,结论大致相同,即犯罪的人更有可能有“越轨”行为的迹象,这表明至少有必要对其进行诊断。一个人患有精神疾病会增加他从事非法行为的可能性,这一点已经被反复讨论,而且实际上已经成为一个公理。研究的目的是形成关于医疗强制措施与非隔离处罚相结合的过程的科学观念。目的:研究司法实践中的规定;查明医疗措施与不与社会隔离的惩罚相关联的问题及其执行情况;提出解决这些法律空白的建议。方法。在研究过程中,既使用了一般科学方法(分析、综合),也使用了法学方法(形式法学、比较法)。研究结果是对强制性医疗措施制度理论和一般刑法措施理论的重要补充。结论。所进行的研究使我们能够断言,如果有充分的理由,有必要对被定罪的人施加接受精神疾病治疗的义务。此外,有必要在刑法中引入逃避履行义务的责任,同时指定对履行义务的控制主体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信