NOTARY RESPONSIBILITY IN CHECKING HALAL CAUSA REQUIREMENTS ON OBJECTS PROMISED

D. Susanti
{"title":"NOTARY RESPONSIBILITY IN CHECKING HALAL CAUSA REQUIREMENTS ON OBJECTS PROMISED","authors":"D. Susanti","doi":"10.22225/JN.5.1.1728.24-32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is motivated by there is a case of cancellation (null and void) of an authentic deed made by a notary because it does not meet the halal causa requirements. This study aims to analyze and find the form of liability of the Notary in halal causa requirements on the promised object. The results of the study using the normative legal research with the statute approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. The results of this study showed that the form of legal liability of the Notary in examining halal causa requirements on the agreed object, namely using the type of liability based on fault, because if halal causa requirements are not fulfilled in the authentic deed which results in the deed being null and void, then it is mistakes of Notaries as officials who are authorized to make and be responsible. At the end of this study, the researcher also provided advice to the government to updated Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position by adding clauses related to the Notary's obligation to check the legal terms of the agreement; as well as advice to the Notary to be more careful, thorough, careful, not taking sides in checking halal causa requirements in the object of the agreement.","PeriodicalId":190076,"journal":{"name":"NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22225/JN.5.1.1728.24-32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is motivated by there is a case of cancellation (null and void) of an authentic deed made by a notary because it does not meet the halal causa requirements. This study aims to analyze and find the form of liability of the Notary in halal causa requirements on the promised object. The results of the study using the normative legal research with the statute approach, conceptual approach, and comparative approach. The results of this study showed that the form of legal liability of the Notary in examining halal causa requirements on the agreed object, namely using the type of liability based on fault, because if halal causa requirements are not fulfilled in the authentic deed which results in the deed being null and void, then it is mistakes of Notaries as officials who are authorized to make and be responsible. At the end of this study, the researcher also provided advice to the government to updated Law Number 2 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Position by adding clauses related to the Notary's obligation to check the legal terms of the agreement; as well as advice to the Notary to be more careful, thorough, careful, not taking sides in checking halal causa requirements in the object of the agreement.
公证责任审核清真原因对承诺对象的要求
本研究的动机是有一个案例的取消(无效)公证的真实契约,因为它不符合清真原因的要求。本研究旨在分析和发现公证员在清真原因中对承诺对象的责任形式要求。研究结果采用了规范法研究方法,包括成文法研究方法、概念研究方法和比较法。本研究的结果表明,公证人在审查清真原因要求对商定对象的法律责任形式,即使用基于过错的责任类型,因为如果清真原因要求没有在真实契约中得到满足,导致契约无效,那么它是公证人作为官员的错误,他们被授权做出并负责。在本研究结束时,研究人员还向政府提供建议,通过增加与公证员检查协议法律条款的义务相关的条款,更新了2014年第2号法律,该法律涉及对2004年第30号法律关于公证员职位的修订;以及建议公证人在检查协议对象的清真原因要求时更加仔细,彻底,仔细,不偏袒任何一方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信