Effect of Various Admixture-Binder Combinations on Workability of Ready-Mix Self-Consolidating Concrete

S. Hwang, K. Khayat
{"title":"Effect of Various Admixture-Binder Combinations on Workability of Ready-Mix Self-Consolidating Concrete","authors":"S. Hwang, K. Khayat","doi":"10.14359/15821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an experimental investigation that was carried out in order to evaluate the effects of high range water reducing admixture (HRWRA), viscosity-enhancing admixture (VEA), and binder type on key workability characteristics of self-consolidating concrete (SCC), including retention of deformability, passing ability, and stability. Concrete-equivalent mortar (CEM) mixtures were prepared to evaluate the effect of admixture-binder combinations on flow characteristics, including minimum water content (MWC) to initiate flow and relative water demand (RWD) to increase a given fluidity. Four polycarboxylate-based HRWRAs, a polynaphthalene sulfonate-based HRWRA, four types of VEAs, and three blended cements were evaluated. In total, 16 SCC mixtures with initial slump flow consistency of 660 +/- 20 mm and air volume of 6.5 +/- 1.5%, and 17 CEM mixtures were investigated. Flow characteristics of SCC and CEM mixtures made with a number of admixture-binder combinations indicate that the efficiency of admixture-binder combination depends on water-to-cementitious material ratio (w/cm), type of binder, and type of admixtures. The CEM approach can be used to evaluate the effect of admixture-binder combination on flow characteristics because the increase in MWC to initiate flow of CEM corresponds to higher demand in HRWRA in SCC mixtures. Binder type was shown to have marked influence on the retention of slump flow, L-box and V-funnel passing ability, filling capacity, and surface settlement characteristics. The binder type also affects HRWRA and air-entraining admixture (AEA) demand. As established from CEMs, B3 quaternary cement with the smallest 50% passing diameter had the highest MWC (lowest packing density) needed to initiate flow and the highest RWD (highest robustness to changes in water). SCCs made with such quaternary cement and polycarboxylate-based HRWRA also exhibited the highest HRWRA demand compared those prepared with other blended cements. Both sets of SCCs made with 0.35 w/cm and 0.42 w/cm plus VEA had similar HRWRA demand and static stability when the polycarboxylate-based HRWRA was used.","PeriodicalId":120168,"journal":{"name":"SP-233: Workability of SCC: Roles of Its Constituents and Measurement Techniques","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SP-233: Workability of SCC: Roles of Its Constituents and Measurement Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14359/15821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This paper describes an experimental investigation that was carried out in order to evaluate the effects of high range water reducing admixture (HRWRA), viscosity-enhancing admixture (VEA), and binder type on key workability characteristics of self-consolidating concrete (SCC), including retention of deformability, passing ability, and stability. Concrete-equivalent mortar (CEM) mixtures were prepared to evaluate the effect of admixture-binder combinations on flow characteristics, including minimum water content (MWC) to initiate flow and relative water demand (RWD) to increase a given fluidity. Four polycarboxylate-based HRWRAs, a polynaphthalene sulfonate-based HRWRA, four types of VEAs, and three blended cements were evaluated. In total, 16 SCC mixtures with initial slump flow consistency of 660 +/- 20 mm and air volume of 6.5 +/- 1.5%, and 17 CEM mixtures were investigated. Flow characteristics of SCC and CEM mixtures made with a number of admixture-binder combinations indicate that the efficiency of admixture-binder combination depends on water-to-cementitious material ratio (w/cm), type of binder, and type of admixtures. The CEM approach can be used to evaluate the effect of admixture-binder combination on flow characteristics because the increase in MWC to initiate flow of CEM corresponds to higher demand in HRWRA in SCC mixtures. Binder type was shown to have marked influence on the retention of slump flow, L-box and V-funnel passing ability, filling capacity, and surface settlement characteristics. The binder type also affects HRWRA and air-entraining admixture (AEA) demand. As established from CEMs, B3 quaternary cement with the smallest 50% passing diameter had the highest MWC (lowest packing density) needed to initiate flow and the highest RWD (highest robustness to changes in water). SCCs made with such quaternary cement and polycarboxylate-based HRWRA also exhibited the highest HRWRA demand compared those prepared with other blended cements. Both sets of SCCs made with 0.35 w/cm and 0.42 w/cm plus VEA had similar HRWRA demand and static stability when the polycarboxylate-based HRWRA was used.
不同外加剂-粘结剂组合对预拌自固结混凝土和易性的影响
本文介绍了一项试验研究,旨在评估高范围减水剂(HRWRA)、增粘剂(VEA)和粘结剂类型对自固结混凝土(SCC)关键和易性特性的影响,包括保持变形能力、通过能力和稳定性。制备了混凝土-等效砂浆(CEM)混合物,以评估外加剂-粘结剂组合对流动特性的影响,包括启动流动的最小含水量(MWC)和增加给定流动性的相对需水量(RWD)。对四种聚羧酸基HRWRA、一种聚萘磺酸基HRWRA、四种vea和三种混合水泥进行了评价。共研究了16种初始坍落度为660 +/- 20 mm、风量为6.5 +/- 1.5%的SCC混合料和17种CEM混合料。采用多种外加剂-粘结剂组合制成的SCC和CEM混合料的流动特性表明,外加剂-粘结剂组合的效率取决于水胶比(w/cm)、粘结剂类型和外加剂类型。CEM方法可用于评估外加剂-粘结剂组合对流动特性的影响,因为增加MWC以启动CEM流动对应于SCC混合物中更高的HRWRA需求。粘结剂类型对滑塌流的截留、l -箱型和v型漏斗的通过能力、充填能力和地表沉降特性有显著影响。粘结剂类型也会影响HRWRA和引气掺合料(AEA)的需求。根据CEMs的研究,通过直径最小为50%的B3四系水泥具有启动流动所需的最高MWC(最低充填密度)和最高RWD(对水的变化具有最高的稳稳性)。与其他混合水泥相比,用这种季系水泥和聚羧酸基HRWRA制成的水泥对HRWRA的需求量也最高。当使用聚羧酸基HRWRA时,以0.35 w/cm和0.42 w/cm加VEA制成的两组SCCs具有相似的HRWRA需求和静态稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信