The Laborers of Nature: Economic Ornithology and the Role of Birds as Agents of Biological Pest Control in North American Agriculture, ca. 1880–1930

Matthew D. Evenden
{"title":"The Laborers of Nature: Economic Ornithology and the Role of Birds as Agents of Biological Pest Control in North American Agriculture, ca. 1880–1930","authors":"Matthew D. Evenden","doi":"10.2307/3983958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Itriculture has been blamed, on occasion, for creating its own pests. In 1864 George Perkins Marsh wrote in Man and Nature that \"[w]ith the cultivated plants of man come the myriad tribes which feed or breed upon them, and agriculture not only introduces new species, but so multiplies the number of individuals as to defy calculation. \"1 Since early in the twentieth century, the solution to insect pests in North American agriculture has been the heavy use of insecticides. Although biological control techniques were important early in the century and have become a focus of attention more recently, the place of insecticides in the twentieth-century history of agricultural pest control is central and remains so. Over the past twenty years, environmental and agricultural historians have sought to analyze the origin and course of pest control regimes in modern North American agriculture.? They have placed particular emphasis on determining why over the course of the past century pesticides came to prevail in pest control regimes. Historians have proposed a variety of possible factors, including the role of agribusiness and statefunded science in institutionalizing and promoting pesticides, the cachet of pesticide research in entomological science following World War II, and the attractiveness of pesticides to farmers. Less attention within this overarching question has been given to the history of biological control, and even when it has been considered, the definition of biological control has been narrowly conceived.' With rare exceptions, biological pest control has been understood to be the use of insect predators (whether introduced into an ecosystem or emergent through habitat modification) in the control of insect or weed pests. This definition, although it covers the broad scope of biological control, ignores various other techniques on its margins. One of these other, marginal techniques is the role of birds as agents of biological control. In the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries, scientific ideas about this method of pest control developed within the context of popular debates over bird preservation and conservation generally. These ideas, although predominantly generated in the United States, were diffused and debated in the Canadian and American agriculrural literature, with little respect for political borders. Avian agent biological control has long been used throughout the world in forestry and has received attention recently in the integrated pest management literature.\" But in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries the notion of using birds to help control pests, among the gamut of methods that were proposed and debated within the agricultural literature, commanded significant attention.' Growing out of the natural historical concern for teleological design in nature and debates over bird importation, systematic studies of the potential role of birds as pest control agents were first produced","PeriodicalId":425736,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Conservation History","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Conservation History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/3983958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Itriculture has been blamed, on occasion, for creating its own pests. In 1864 George Perkins Marsh wrote in Man and Nature that "[w]ith the cultivated plants of man come the myriad tribes which feed or breed upon them, and agriculture not only introduces new species, but so multiplies the number of individuals as to defy calculation. "1 Since early in the twentieth century, the solution to insect pests in North American agriculture has been the heavy use of insecticides. Although biological control techniques were important early in the century and have become a focus of attention more recently, the place of insecticides in the twentieth-century history of agricultural pest control is central and remains so. Over the past twenty years, environmental and agricultural historians have sought to analyze the origin and course of pest control regimes in modern North American agriculture.? They have placed particular emphasis on determining why over the course of the past century pesticides came to prevail in pest control regimes. Historians have proposed a variety of possible factors, including the role of agribusiness and statefunded science in institutionalizing and promoting pesticides, the cachet of pesticide research in entomological science following World War II, and the attractiveness of pesticides to farmers. Less attention within this overarching question has been given to the history of biological control, and even when it has been considered, the definition of biological control has been narrowly conceived.' With rare exceptions, biological pest control has been understood to be the use of insect predators (whether introduced into an ecosystem or emergent through habitat modification) in the control of insect or weed pests. This definition, although it covers the broad scope of biological control, ignores various other techniques on its margins. One of these other, marginal techniques is the role of birds as agents of biological control. In the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries, scientific ideas about this method of pest control developed within the context of popular debates over bird preservation and conservation generally. These ideas, although predominantly generated in the United States, were diffused and debated in the Canadian and American agriculrural literature, with little respect for political borders. Avian agent biological control has long been used throughout the world in forestry and has received attention recently in the integrated pest management literature." But in the late-nineteenth and early-twentieth centuries the notion of using birds to help control pests, among the gamut of methods that were proposed and debated within the agricultural literature, commanded significant attention.' Growing out of the natural historical concern for teleological design in nature and debates over bird importation, systematic studies of the potential role of birds as pest control agents were first produced
自然的劳动者:经济鸟类学和鸟类作为生物害虫控制剂在北美农业中的作用,约1880-1930
农业有时被指责为制造害虫的罪魁祸首。1864年,乔治·帕金斯·马什在《人与自然》中写道:“随着人类种植的植物,出现了无数以它们为食或繁殖的部落,农业不仅引入了新物种,而且使个体的数量倍增,以至于无法计算。”自20世纪初以来,北美农业解决害虫的办法一直是大量使用杀虫剂。尽管生物防治技术在本世纪初很重要,最近又成为人们关注的焦点,但杀虫剂在20世纪农业病虫害防治史上的地位仍然是中心的。在过去的二十年里,环境和农业历史学家试图分析现代北美农业害虫控制制度的起源和过程。他们特别强调确定为什么在过去的一个世纪中,杀虫剂在害虫控制制度中盛行。历史学家提出了各种可能的因素,包括农业综合企业和国家资助的科学在将农药制度化和推广农药方面的作用,二战后昆虫学中农药研究的声望,以及农药对农民的吸引力。在这个首要问题中,人们对生物防治的历史关注较少,即使考虑到了这一点,生物防治的定义也是狭隘的。”除极少数例外情况外,生物虫害防治已被理解为利用昆虫捕食者(无论是引入生态系统的还是通过生境改变而出现的)来控制害虫或杂草。这一定义虽然涵盖了生物防治的广泛范围,但忽略了其他各种边缘技术。另一种边缘技术是利用鸟类作为生物控制手段。在19世纪末和20世纪初,关于这种害虫控制方法的科学思想是在关于鸟类保护和一般保护的流行辩论的背景下发展起来的。这些观点,虽然主要产生于美国,但在加拿大和美国的农业文学中传播和辩论,几乎不尊重政治边界。禽源生物防治在世界范围内的林业应用已久,近年来在病虫害综合治理文献中受到重视。但在19世纪末和20世纪初,在农业文献中提出和争论的各种方法中,利用鸟类帮助控制害虫的概念引起了极大的关注。”出于对自然目的设计的自然历史关注和对鸟类进口的争论,首次产生了对鸟类作为害虫控制剂的潜在作用的系统研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信