“Unjust” War, wrongful justification, and international humanitarian law

Zia Akhtar
{"title":"“Unjust” War, wrongful justification, and international humanitarian law","authors":"Zia Akhtar","doi":"10.13169/jglobfaul.10.1.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The potential exists for charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity against the perpetrators of the invasion of Iraq, namely, former Prime Minister Tony Blair and his entourage. The findings of the Chilcot Inquiry in 2016 do not rule out the International Criminal Court taking action, and this article argues that it is plausible for those leaders who took the UK to war to be prosecuted for breaching international human rights law and international humanitarian law. This is because, first, the UNSCR 1441 was not respected by the British government that gave UN inspectors more time to investigate if Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and, second, there is a measure of personal responsibility for those who gave the order for the invasion that has led to catastrophic consequences both in terms of human casualties and material damage in its aftermath.","PeriodicalId":167633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Faultlines","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Faultlines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/jglobfaul.10.1.0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The potential exists for charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity against the perpetrators of the invasion of Iraq, namely, former Prime Minister Tony Blair and his entourage. The findings of the Chilcot Inquiry in 2016 do not rule out the International Criminal Court taking action, and this article argues that it is plausible for those leaders who took the UK to war to be prosecuted for breaching international human rights law and international humanitarian law. This is because, first, the UNSCR 1441 was not respected by the British government that gave UN inspectors more time to investigate if Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMD), and, second, there is a measure of personal responsibility for those who gave the order for the invasion that has led to catastrophic consequences both in terms of human casualties and material damage in its aftermath.
“非正义”战争,错误的辩护,以及国际人道主义法
有可能对入侵伊拉克的肇事者,即前首相托尼·布莱尔及其随行人员提出战争罪和危害人类罪的指控。2016年齐尔考特调查的结果并不排除国际刑事法院采取行动的可能性,本文认为,那些将英国带入战争的领导人因违反国际人权法和国际人道主义法而受到起诉是合理的。这是因为,首先,联合国安理会第1441号决议没有得到英国政府的尊重,英国政府给了联合国核查人员更多的时间来调查伊拉克是否拥有大规模杀伤性武器(WMD);其次,下令入侵的人要承担一定的个人责任,而入侵造成了人员伤亡和物质损失等灾难性后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信