“Live within the messiness”: how a digitally mediated inquiry community supported ELA teachers in cultivating adaptive repertoires

Bethany Monea, Katie Burrows-Stone, Jennifer Griffith Dunbar, Jennifer L. Freed, A. Stornaiuolo, Autumn A. Griffin
{"title":"“Live within the messiness”: how a digitally mediated inquiry community supported ELA teachers in cultivating adaptive repertoires","authors":"Bethany Monea, Katie Burrows-Stone, Jennifer Griffith Dunbar, Jennifer L. Freed, A. Stornaiuolo, Autumn A. Griffin","doi":"10.1108/etpc-08-2021-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nAdaptivity has long been recognized as a key aspect of teaching and shown to be particularly important for English Language Arts (ELA) teachers leading discussions about texts. Teachers' abilities to make such adjustments are especially important when facilitating discussions in digital contexts, as was made clear with the shift to virtual teaching caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this paper is to explore how the structure and process of teacher inquiry supported ELA teachers in enacting and cultivating adaptive repertoires for facilitating discussion in online contexts during the disruptions of the 2020–2021 school year.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nAs an inquiry team comprising teacher-researchers from secondary and university-based contexts, the authors used practitioner inquiry methods in the context of a multi-year, multi-sited study involving, design-based and teacher-research methodologies.\n\n\nFindings\nThis paper shows how teachers’ engagement in digital teacher inquiry groups supported their willingness to be playful and adapt their practices in response to one another, creating conditions for powerful teacher learning through relational inquiry online. This paper identified three specific relational practices that were critical for cultivating adaptive repertories in teachers’ learning with and from each other: cultivating empathy; attuning to silences and actively listening; and decentering authority across multiple platforms and modalities. The authors discuss how teachers carried these practices to and from their digital discussions with their students and with each other, demonstrating how this recursive cycle of inquiry and practice deepened their learning, relationships and adaptive repertoires.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe authors discuss the implications of these practices for equity-oriented and dialogic teacher learning that can transform classroom practice, illustrating the power of online teacher inquiry groups for developing ELA teachers’ adaptive expertise – something urgently important for teaching in digitally mediated contexts and through unsettled times.\n","PeriodicalId":428767,"journal":{"name":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"English Teaching: Practice & Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/etpc-08-2021-0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Adaptivity has long been recognized as a key aspect of teaching and shown to be particularly important for English Language Arts (ELA) teachers leading discussions about texts. Teachers' abilities to make such adjustments are especially important when facilitating discussions in digital contexts, as was made clear with the shift to virtual teaching caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this paper is to explore how the structure and process of teacher inquiry supported ELA teachers in enacting and cultivating adaptive repertoires for facilitating discussion in online contexts during the disruptions of the 2020–2021 school year. Design/methodology/approach As an inquiry team comprising teacher-researchers from secondary and university-based contexts, the authors used practitioner inquiry methods in the context of a multi-year, multi-sited study involving, design-based and teacher-research methodologies. Findings This paper shows how teachers’ engagement in digital teacher inquiry groups supported their willingness to be playful and adapt their practices in response to one another, creating conditions for powerful teacher learning through relational inquiry online. This paper identified three specific relational practices that were critical for cultivating adaptive repertories in teachers’ learning with and from each other: cultivating empathy; attuning to silences and actively listening; and decentering authority across multiple platforms and modalities. The authors discuss how teachers carried these practices to and from their digital discussions with their students and with each other, demonstrating how this recursive cycle of inquiry and practice deepened their learning, relationships and adaptive repertoires. Originality/value The authors discuss the implications of these practices for equity-oriented and dialogic teacher learning that can transform classroom practice, illustrating the power of online teacher inquiry groups for developing ELA teachers’ adaptive expertise – something urgently important for teaching in digitally mediated contexts and through unsettled times.
“在混乱中生活”:数字媒介探究社区如何支持ELA教师培养适应性曲目
长期以来,适应性一直被认为是教学的一个关键方面,对英语语言艺术(ELA)教师领导文本讨论尤为重要。在促进数字环境下的讨论时,教师进行此类调整的能力尤为重要,COVID-19大流行导致的虚拟教学的转变就清楚地表明了这一点。本文的目的是探讨教师探究的结构和过程如何支持ELA教师制定和培养适应性曲目,以便在2020-2021学年中断期间促进在线背景下的讨论。设计/方法/方法由来自中学和大学的教师研究人员组成的调查小组,作者在一项涉及基于设计和教师研究方法的多年、多地点研究的背景下使用了实践者调查方法。研究结果:本文展示了教师参与数字教师探究小组如何支持他们的趣味性意愿,并根据彼此的需求调整自己的实践,为教师通过在线关系探究进行强大的学习创造了条件。本文确定了在教师相互学习和相互学习中培养适应性储备的三个具体关系实践:培养同理心;适应沉默和积极倾听;在多个平台和模式上分散权力。作者讨论了教师如何将这些实践带到与学生以及彼此之间的数字讨论中,展示了这种递归的探究和实践循环如何加深了他们的学习,关系和适应性曲目。作者讨论了这些实践对公平导向和对话式教师学习的影响,这些实践可以改变课堂实践,说明了在线教师探究小组在发展ELA教师适应性专业知识方面的力量——这对于数字媒介背景下和动荡时期的教学至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信