Networking in child exploitation — Assessing disruption strategies using registrant information

Russell Allsup, E. Thomas, Bryan Monk, Richard Frank, M. Bouchard
{"title":"Networking in child exploitation — Assessing disruption strategies using registrant information","authors":"Russell Allsup, E. Thomas, Bryan Monk, Richard Frank, M. Bouchard","doi":"10.1145/2808797.2809297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research utilizes social network analysis to determine the success of three different disruption strategies on a child exploitation network extracted from the public internet. Using a custom-written web-crawler called LECEN, data from a set of hyperlinked child-exploitation websites was collected from the Internet. From these data, two types of networks were coded: the nodes of the first network consisted of only website domains, while the nodes of the second were generated using the registrant data, where the nodes represented the legal owners of those same domains. Three attack scenarios were carried out on these two networks: two types of hub attacks (one focused on in-degree and one focused on out-degree) and a bridge attack. Using these disruption strategies, it was found that bridge attacks were more suitable for disrupting the domain networks, while both hub-attacks could be favored when disrupting the network of registrants. These findings have implications for law enforcement, as it provides real-world applications to disruption where registrants may be targeted directly.","PeriodicalId":371988,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","volume":"511 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2808797.2809297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This research utilizes social network analysis to determine the success of three different disruption strategies on a child exploitation network extracted from the public internet. Using a custom-written web-crawler called LECEN, data from a set of hyperlinked child-exploitation websites was collected from the Internet. From these data, two types of networks were coded: the nodes of the first network consisted of only website domains, while the nodes of the second were generated using the registrant data, where the nodes represented the legal owners of those same domains. Three attack scenarios were carried out on these two networks: two types of hub attacks (one focused on in-degree and one focused on out-degree) and a bridge attack. Using these disruption strategies, it was found that bridge attacks were more suitable for disrupting the domain networks, while both hub-attacks could be favored when disrupting the network of registrants. These findings have implications for law enforcement, as it provides real-world applications to disruption where registrants may be targeted directly.
儿童剥削中的网络-利用注册者信息评估破坏策略
本研究利用社会网络分析来确定从公共互联网中提取的儿童剥削网络上三种不同的中断策略的成功。使用一种名为LECEN的定制网络爬虫,从互联网上收集了一组超链接的儿童剥削网站的数据。根据这些数据,对两种类型的网络进行了编码:第一个网络的节点仅由网站域名组成,而第二个网络的节点使用注册数据生成,其中节点代表这些相同域名的合法所有者。在这两个网络上进行了三种攻击场景:两种集线器攻击(一种集中在入度,一种集中在出度)和桥接攻击。使用这些中断策略,发现桥接攻击更适合破坏域网络,而在破坏注册者网络时,两种集线器攻击都可能受到青睐。这些发现对执法有影响,因为它为注册人可能直接针对的破坏提供了现实世界的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信