Nervous nation: Fear, conflict and narratives of fortified domestic architecture on the Queensland frontier

Heather Burke, Ray Kerkhove, Lynley A. Wallis, C. Keys, B. Barker
{"title":"Nervous nation: Fear, conflict and narratives of fortified domestic architecture on the Queensland frontier","authors":"Heather Burke, Ray Kerkhove, Lynley A. Wallis, C. Keys, B. Barker","doi":"10.22459/AH.44.2020.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The frontier of nineteenth- and twentieth-century Australia was a place in which colonists routinely lived in fear of retaliation by the Aboriginal peoples whose traditional lands they had forcibly dispossessed. It has been suggested this concern manifested itself in domestic architecture, in both active and passive defensive strategies designed to afford protection against various forms of potential attack. Yet there remains a lack of substantive research to support such assertions. In this article, we present an analysis of accounts drawn from a range of sources of 97 domestic structures across Queensland with claims for defensive features. Although suggesting that fortified domestic structures were more common than previously envisaged, our review indicates that defensive features were usually minimal – holes in walls and barrable doors, windows or other ports of entry – reflecting the often expedient nature of the structures themselves. First-hand accounts of these buildings are rare, although not entirely absent, with most written accounts being reminiscences told in hindsight by later descendants, resulting in both distortions and myth-building. Accounts of fortified domestic structures peak in the decades following Federation and through both World Wars as the newly minted Australian nation explicitly engaged in nation-building and constructing the ‘glorious pioneer’ narrative","PeriodicalId":347548,"journal":{"name":"Aboriginal History Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aboriginal History Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/AH.44.2020.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The frontier of nineteenth- and twentieth-century Australia was a place in which colonists routinely lived in fear of retaliation by the Aboriginal peoples whose traditional lands they had forcibly dispossessed. It has been suggested this concern manifested itself in domestic architecture, in both active and passive defensive strategies designed to afford protection against various forms of potential attack. Yet there remains a lack of substantive research to support such assertions. In this article, we present an analysis of accounts drawn from a range of sources of 97 domestic structures across Queensland with claims for defensive features. Although suggesting that fortified domestic structures were more common than previously envisaged, our review indicates that defensive features were usually minimal – holes in walls and barrable doors, windows or other ports of entry – reflecting the often expedient nature of the structures themselves. First-hand accounts of these buildings are rare, although not entirely absent, with most written accounts being reminiscences told in hindsight by later descendants, resulting in both distortions and myth-building. Accounts of fortified domestic structures peak in the decades following Federation and through both World Wars as the newly minted Australian nation explicitly engaged in nation-building and constructing the ‘glorious pioneer’ narrative
紧张的民族:恐惧,冲突和叙事强化国内建筑在昆士兰边境
19世纪和20世纪澳大利亚的边境是殖民者经常生活的地方,他们害怕土著人民的报复,因为他们强行剥夺了土著人民的传统土地。有人认为,这种关切在国内建筑中表现出来,包括主动和被动的防御战略,旨在提供保护,防止各种形式的潜在攻击。然而,仍然缺乏实质性的研究来支持这种说法。在本文中,我们对昆士兰州97个国内结构的各种来源进行了分析,并提出了防御特征的要求。虽然我们的审查表明,加固的家庭结构比以前设想的更普遍,但我们的审查表明,防御特征通常是最小的-墙上的洞和栅栏门,窗户或其他入口-反映了结构本身往往是权宜之计的性质。这些建筑的第一手资料很少,尽管不是完全没有,大多数书面记录都是后来的后代事后讲述的回忆,导致扭曲和神话的建立。在联邦成立后的几十年和两次世界大战期间,随着新成立的澳大利亚国家明确投身于国家建设和构建“光荣的先驱”叙事,对强化国内结构的描述达到了顶峰
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信