Foreign Language Education and Dynamics of Foreign Language Competence

Eva Stranovská, S. Hvozdíková, Dasa Munková, Gadušová Zdenka
{"title":"Foreign Language Education and Dynamics of Foreign Language Competence","authors":"Eva Stranovská, S. Hvozdíková, Dasa Munková, Gadušová Zdenka","doi":"10.15405/EJSBS.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1.IntroductionCurrently, the need to speak foreign languages across the world has created a significant need for efficient methodologies, high quality resources and well-educated and qualified, interdisciplinary educated foreign language teachers for the development of foreign language competence. While there has been a sincere search into these aspects of foreign language education, the objectives and syllabi of such programmes have also gone through extensive overhauling to meet the needs of the global marketplace. This overhaul is connected to the need for good communication skills in foreign languages as today, it is not enough to be able to read or write in a foreign language, but to be able to communicate authentically in a foreign language speaking world. Acknowledging these needs, foreign language teaching methodology has shifted its focus from grammar and traditional receptive teaching to communicative and community based approaches with a wider focus on the interdisciplinary aspects of foreign language education. Although foreign language teaching is a broad topic that has been extensively discussed over the years, the following study was meant to be a discourse on uncovering insights into potentially successful methodology in teaching foreign languages as well as examining a specific element of foreign language learning, that is the dynamics of foreign language competence.The field of foreign language learning has been discussed and analyzed from a wide variety of viewpoints and determinants (Richards 2006; Janikova, 2011; Lojova, 2005; Stranovska, 2011; Rickheit, Sichelschmidt & Strohner, 2007; Rickheit, Strohner & Vorwerg, 2008). Previous research studies looked mainly into foreign language competence and its relationship to communication skills and reading comprehension skills (Devine, 1987; Carrell, 1983; Clarke, 1976; Eskey, 1973; Goodman 1967, 1971). Furthermore, the aims of the previous research studies were to examine the two following hypotheses: The Linguistic Threshold Hypothesis and The Linguistic Interdependency Hypothesis. The basic argument of the Linguistic Threshold Hypothesis is that a certain level of competence in a foreign language has to be in place before learners are able to perform fluently in a foreign language. The Interdependency Hypothesis argues that prior to the acquisition of the second or foreign language (L2, L3), the first language (L1) skills have to be sufficiently developed. Recent studies have focused predominantly on examining predictors of reading; operating memory, language sensitivity, rapid naming, and phonological awareness, as well as personal characteristics and social competences of language acquisition (Anthony & Francis, 2005; Foy & Mann, 2006; Smith-Spark & Fisk, 2007; Stranovska et al., 2013). Additionally, contemporary research studies examined the influence of a variety of foreign language instructional methods in teaching foreign language on foreign language competence (Farkasova, 2008, Janikova, 2011, Stranovska et al., 2013). However, the variable of foreign language development in relation to intervention on the variable of foreign language learning strategies used and their influence on foreign language learners' competence has not been investigated in the academic environment as evidenced by the paucity of research studies on intervention in foreign language learning in the academic environment. Stanovic (1984) and Ehlers (1998) investigated interdependency of learning strategies in first and foreign languages and the influence of the strategies on foreign language learning and found that the interdependency of learning strategies did influence foreign language learning and competence.Therefore, the current study sought to examine the dynamics of foreign language competence through the means of the Linguistic Intervention Programme (LIP). Pre-test and post-test scores served as the tool to measure the dynamics of foreign language competence in this study. …","PeriodicalId":164632,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15405/EJSBS.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

1.IntroductionCurrently, the need to speak foreign languages across the world has created a significant need for efficient methodologies, high quality resources and well-educated and qualified, interdisciplinary educated foreign language teachers for the development of foreign language competence. While there has been a sincere search into these aspects of foreign language education, the objectives and syllabi of such programmes have also gone through extensive overhauling to meet the needs of the global marketplace. This overhaul is connected to the need for good communication skills in foreign languages as today, it is not enough to be able to read or write in a foreign language, but to be able to communicate authentically in a foreign language speaking world. Acknowledging these needs, foreign language teaching methodology has shifted its focus from grammar and traditional receptive teaching to communicative and community based approaches with a wider focus on the interdisciplinary aspects of foreign language education. Although foreign language teaching is a broad topic that has been extensively discussed over the years, the following study was meant to be a discourse on uncovering insights into potentially successful methodology in teaching foreign languages as well as examining a specific element of foreign language learning, that is the dynamics of foreign language competence.The field of foreign language learning has been discussed and analyzed from a wide variety of viewpoints and determinants (Richards 2006; Janikova, 2011; Lojova, 2005; Stranovska, 2011; Rickheit, Sichelschmidt & Strohner, 2007; Rickheit, Strohner & Vorwerg, 2008). Previous research studies looked mainly into foreign language competence and its relationship to communication skills and reading comprehension skills (Devine, 1987; Carrell, 1983; Clarke, 1976; Eskey, 1973; Goodman 1967, 1971). Furthermore, the aims of the previous research studies were to examine the two following hypotheses: The Linguistic Threshold Hypothesis and The Linguistic Interdependency Hypothesis. The basic argument of the Linguistic Threshold Hypothesis is that a certain level of competence in a foreign language has to be in place before learners are able to perform fluently in a foreign language. The Interdependency Hypothesis argues that prior to the acquisition of the second or foreign language (L2, L3), the first language (L1) skills have to be sufficiently developed. Recent studies have focused predominantly on examining predictors of reading; operating memory, language sensitivity, rapid naming, and phonological awareness, as well as personal characteristics and social competences of language acquisition (Anthony & Francis, 2005; Foy & Mann, 2006; Smith-Spark & Fisk, 2007; Stranovska et al., 2013). Additionally, contemporary research studies examined the influence of a variety of foreign language instructional methods in teaching foreign language on foreign language competence (Farkasova, 2008, Janikova, 2011, Stranovska et al., 2013). However, the variable of foreign language development in relation to intervention on the variable of foreign language learning strategies used and their influence on foreign language learners' competence has not been investigated in the academic environment as evidenced by the paucity of research studies on intervention in foreign language learning in the academic environment. Stanovic (1984) and Ehlers (1998) investigated interdependency of learning strategies in first and foreign languages and the influence of the strategies on foreign language learning and found that the interdependency of learning strategies did influence foreign language learning and competence.Therefore, the current study sought to examine the dynamics of foreign language competence through the means of the Linguistic Intervention Programme (LIP). Pre-test and post-test scores served as the tool to measure the dynamics of foreign language competence in this study. …
外语教育与外语能力动态
1.目前,世界各地对外语的需求创造了对有效的方法、高质量的资源和受过良好教育的合格的、跨学科教育的外语教师的巨大需求,以发展外语能力。虽然对外语教育的这些方面进行了真诚的探索,但这些课程的目标和教学大纲也经过了广泛的改革,以满足全球市场的需要。这一改革与良好的外语沟通技巧的需求有关,因为今天,能够用外语阅读或写作是不够的,而是能够在外语世界中进行真实的交流。认识到这些需求,外语教学方法已将其重点从语法和传统的接受性教学转向交际和社区为基础的方法,更广泛地关注外语教育的跨学科方面。虽然外语教学是一个广泛的话题,多年来一直被广泛讨论,但下面的研究旨在揭示潜在成功的外语教学方法的见解,并研究外语学习的一个特定因素,即外语能力的动态。外语学习领域已经从各种各样的观点和决定因素进行了讨论和分析(Richards 2006;Janikova, 2011;Lojova, 2005;Stranovska, 2011;richeit, Sichelschmidt & Strohner, 2007;richeit, Strohner & Vorwerg, 2008)。以往的研究主要关注外语能力及其与交际能力和阅读理解能力的关系(Devine, 1987;卡雷尔,1983;克拉克,1976;Eskey, 1973;Goodman 1967, 1971)。此外,以往研究的目的是检验以下两个假设:语言阈值假设和语言相互依存假设。语言阈值假说的基本论点是,在学习者能够流利地使用外语之前,必须具备一定水平的外语能力。相互依赖假说认为,在习得第二语言或外语(L2, L3)之前,第一语言(L1)技能必须得到充分发展。最近的研究主要集中在检查阅读的预测因素;操作记忆、语言敏感性、快速命名和语音意识,以及语言习得的个人特征和社会能力(Anthony & Francis, 2005;Foy & Mann, 2006;Smith-Spark & Fisk, 2007;Stranovska et al., 2013)。此外,当代研究还考察了外语教学中各种外语教学方法对外语能力的影响(Farkasova, 2008, Janikova, 2011, Stranovska et al., 2013)。然而,外语发展变量对外语学习策略使用变量的干预及其对外语学习者能力的影响尚未在学术环境中进行研究,这可以从学术环境中外语学习干预研究的缺乏中看出。Stanovic(1984)和Ehlers(1998)研究了母语和外语学习策略的相互依赖以及策略对外语学习的影响,发现学习策略的相互依赖确实影响外语学习和外语能力。因此,本研究试图通过语言干预计划(LIP)的手段来检验外语能力的动态。本研究以测试前和测试后得分作为衡量外语能力动态的工具。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信