Early identification of STEMI patients with emergency chest pain using lipidomics combined with machine learning.

Zhi Shang, Yang Liu, Yuyao Yuan, Xinyu Wang, Haiyi Yu, W. Gao
{"title":"Early identification of STEMI patients with emergency chest pain using lipidomics combined with machine learning.","authors":"Zhi Shang, Yang Liu, Yuyao Yuan, Xinyu Wang, Haiyi Yu, W. Gao","doi":"10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES\nTo analyze the differential expression of lipid spectrum between ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and patients with emergency chest pain and excluded coronary artery disease (CAD), and establish the predictive model which could predict STEMI in the early stage.\n\n\nMETHODS\nWe conducted a single-center, nested case-control study using the emergency chest pain cohort of Peking University Third Hospital. Untargeted lipidomics were conducted while LASSO regression as well as XGBoost combined with greedy algorithm were used to select lipid molecules.\n\n\nRESULTS\nFifty-two STEMI patients along with 52 controls were enrolled. A total of 1925 lipid molecules were detected. There were 93 lipid molecules in the positive ion mode which were differentially expressed between the STEMI and the control group, while in the negative ion mode, there were 73 differentially expressed lipid molecules. In the positive ion mode, the differentially expressed lipid subclasses were mainly diacylglycerol (DG), lysophophatidylcholine (LPC), acylcarnitine (CAR), lysophosphatidyl ethanolamine (LPE), and phosphatidylcholine (PC), while in the negative ion mode, significantly expressed lipid subclasses were mainly free fatty acid (FA), LPE, PC, phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and phosphatidylinositol (PI). LASSO regression selected 22 lipids while XGBoost combined with greedy algorithm selected 10 lipids. PC (15: 0/18: 2), PI (19: 4), and LPI (20: 3) were the overlapping lipid molecules selected by the two feature screening methods. Logistic model established using the three lipids had excellent performance in discrimination and calibration both in the derivation set (AUC: 0.972) and an internal validation set (AUC: 0.967). In 19 STEMI patients with normal cardiac troponin, 18 patients were correctly diagnosed using lipid model.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe differentially expressed lipids were mainly DG, CAR, LPC, LPE, PC, PI, PE, and FA. Using lipid molecules selected by XGBoost combined with greedy algorithm and LASSO regression to establish model could accurately predict STEMI even in the more earlier stage.","PeriodicalId":285674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric cardiology : JGC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2022.09.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES To analyze the differential expression of lipid spectrum between ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) and patients with emergency chest pain and excluded coronary artery disease (CAD), and establish the predictive model which could predict STEMI in the early stage. METHODS We conducted a single-center, nested case-control study using the emergency chest pain cohort of Peking University Third Hospital. Untargeted lipidomics were conducted while LASSO regression as well as XGBoost combined with greedy algorithm were used to select lipid molecules. RESULTS Fifty-two STEMI patients along with 52 controls were enrolled. A total of 1925 lipid molecules were detected. There were 93 lipid molecules in the positive ion mode which were differentially expressed between the STEMI and the control group, while in the negative ion mode, there were 73 differentially expressed lipid molecules. In the positive ion mode, the differentially expressed lipid subclasses were mainly diacylglycerol (DG), lysophophatidylcholine (LPC), acylcarnitine (CAR), lysophosphatidyl ethanolamine (LPE), and phosphatidylcholine (PC), while in the negative ion mode, significantly expressed lipid subclasses were mainly free fatty acid (FA), LPE, PC, phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), and phosphatidylinositol (PI). LASSO regression selected 22 lipids while XGBoost combined with greedy algorithm selected 10 lipids. PC (15: 0/18: 2), PI (19: 4), and LPI (20: 3) were the overlapping lipid molecules selected by the two feature screening methods. Logistic model established using the three lipids had excellent performance in discrimination and calibration both in the derivation set (AUC: 0.972) and an internal validation set (AUC: 0.967). In 19 STEMI patients with normal cardiac troponin, 18 patients were correctly diagnosed using lipid model. CONCLUSIONS The differentially expressed lipids were mainly DG, CAR, LPC, LPE, PC, PI, PE, and FA. Using lipid molecules selected by XGBoost combined with greedy algorithm and LASSO regression to establish model could accurately predict STEMI even in the more earlier stage.
脂质组学联合机器学习对STEMI患者急诊胸痛的早期识别
目的分析st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)与急诊胸痛排除冠心病(CAD)患者血脂谱表达差异,建立早期STEMI预测模型。方法采用北京大学第三医院急诊胸痛队列进行单中心、巢式病例对照研究。进行非靶向脂质组学,使用LASSO回归和XGBoost结合贪心算法选择脂质分子。结果纳入52例STEMI患者和52例对照组。共检测到1925个脂质分子。STEMI组与对照组在正离子模式下差异表达的脂质分子有93个,在负离子模式下差异表达的脂质分子有73个。在正离子模式下,差异表达的脂质亚类主要为二酰基甘油(DG)、溶血磷脂酰胆碱(LPC)、酰基肉碱(CAR)、溶血磷脂酰乙醇胺(LPE)和磷脂酰胆碱(PC),而在负离子模式下,差异表达的脂质亚类主要为游离脂肪酸(FA)、LPE、PC、磷脂酰乙醇胺(PE)和磷脂酰肌醇(PI)。LASSO回归选取了22个脂质,XGBoost结合贪心算法选取了10个脂质。PC(15:0 / 18:2)、PI(19:4)和LPI(20:3)是两种特征筛选方法选择的重叠脂质分子。在推导集(AUC: 0.972)和内部验证集(AUC: 0.967)上,采用三种脂质建立的Logistic模型具有良好的鉴别和校准性能。在19例心肌肌钙蛋白正常的STEMI患者中,脂质模型正确诊断18例。结论差异表达的脂质主要为DG、CAR、LPC、LPE、PC、PI、PE和FA。利用XGBoost选择的脂质分子结合贪心算法和LASSO回归建立模型,即使在较早的阶段也能准确预测STEMI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信