Strategies for Evaluating Communication Development in Infants

Dan McClowry
{"title":"Strategies for Evaluating Communication Development in Infants","authors":"Dan McClowry","doi":"10.1055/s-0028-1094174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of the at-risk infant's developmental status requires the cooperative efforts of a team of specialists. No team member can function optimally in isolation. The speech-language clinician's assessment protocol necessarily overlaps and complements that of other professionals. Team members, including the infant's parents, cooperate to develop a comprehensive, transdisciplinary habilitative plan to guide clinicians and family members in devising natural, functional, child-centered activities. Such activities will integrate therapeutic strategies to enhance development across communicative, cognitive, motor, and emotional areas. The speech-language clinician's initial role in the assessment/habilitation process is to provide the team with a quantitative and qualitative description of the infant's communication development. The latter will provide the focus for this article. Dunst (1980) argues that obtaining a valid qualitative assessment is the most important aspect in the clinical process. It also is the most difficult. Obtaining a comprehensive description of the child's development requires the use of a sophisticated instrument. The clinician must become that instrument. The effective clinician must have a well founded knowledge of the language-learning system, experience in observing and describing communicative behaviors and the ability to develop hypotheses. He needs the flexibility to change ideas and procedures as indicated and sufficient confidence to work independently or to be able to ask for support as needed (Siegel, 1975). The clinician's perspective should acknowledge that the infant's developing skills for adaptive interactions with people and objects emerge in a set order, with the time of emergence of any specific skill being jointly influenced by internal mechanisms and environmental circumstances (Dunst, 1980; Fisher and Corrigan, 1980; Richards, 1978; Seibert and Oiler, 1981). The clinician's perspective considers personality variables which, in unnatural environments, may adversely affect the infant's learning style. It acknowledges that each infant has a unique history of interactions with the world and that this history provides the infant with a variety of strategies to use in active problem-solving situations and in the development of communication. Since the clinician is concerned with the evalution of handicapped or at-risk infants, the assessment protocol should evolve from a broad definition of communication which will provide a multitude of entry points for habilitation. Thus, any behavior of the infant should be viewed as occurring on a continuum from least","PeriodicalId":364385,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","volume":"4 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1982-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Speech, Language and Hearing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1094174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of the at-risk infant's developmental status requires the cooperative efforts of a team of specialists. No team member can function optimally in isolation. The speech-language clinician's assessment protocol necessarily overlaps and complements that of other professionals. Team members, including the infant's parents, cooperate to develop a comprehensive, transdisciplinary habilitative plan to guide clinicians and family members in devising natural, functional, child-centered activities. Such activities will integrate therapeutic strategies to enhance development across communicative, cognitive, motor, and emotional areas. The speech-language clinician's initial role in the assessment/habilitation process is to provide the team with a quantitative and qualitative description of the infant's communication development. The latter will provide the focus for this article. Dunst (1980) argues that obtaining a valid qualitative assessment is the most important aspect in the clinical process. It also is the most difficult. Obtaining a comprehensive description of the child's development requires the use of a sophisticated instrument. The clinician must become that instrument. The effective clinician must have a well founded knowledge of the language-learning system, experience in observing and describing communicative behaviors and the ability to develop hypotheses. He needs the flexibility to change ideas and procedures as indicated and sufficient confidence to work independently or to be able to ask for support as needed (Siegel, 1975). The clinician's perspective should acknowledge that the infant's developing skills for adaptive interactions with people and objects emerge in a set order, with the time of emergence of any specific skill being jointly influenced by internal mechanisms and environmental circumstances (Dunst, 1980; Fisher and Corrigan, 1980; Richards, 1978; Seibert and Oiler, 1981). The clinician's perspective considers personality variables which, in unnatural environments, may adversely affect the infant's learning style. It acknowledges that each infant has a unique history of interactions with the world and that this history provides the infant with a variety of strategies to use in active problem-solving situations and in the development of communication. Since the clinician is concerned with the evalution of handicapped or at-risk infants, the assessment protocol should evolve from a broad definition of communication which will provide a multitude of entry points for habilitation. Thus, any behavior of the infant should be viewed as occurring on a continuum from least
评价婴儿沟通发展的策略
评估高危婴儿的发育状况需要一组专家的合作努力。没有一个团队成员可以在孤立的情况下发挥最佳作用。语言临床医生的评估方案必然与其他专业人员的评估方案重叠和互补。团队成员,包括婴儿的父母,合作制定一个全面的,跨学科的康复计划,指导临床医生和家庭成员设计自然的,功能性的,以儿童为中心的活动。这些活动将整合治疗策略,以促进交流、认知、运动和情感领域的发展。语言临床医生在评估/康复过程中的首要作用是为团队提供婴儿沟通发展的定量和定性描述。后者将是本文的重点。Dunst(1980)认为获得有效的定性评估是临床过程中最重要的方面。这也是最难的。要对儿童的发育进行全面的描述,需要使用一种精密的仪器。临床医生必须成为这样的工具。有效的临床医生必须有扎实的语言学习系统知识,观察和描述交际行为的经验,以及提出假设的能力。他需要灵活地根据指示改变想法和程序,并有足够的信心独立工作或能够在需要时寻求支持(Siegel, 1975)。临床医生的观点应该承认,婴儿与人与物进行适应性互动的发展技能是按照既定的顺序出现的,任何特定技能出现的时间都受到内部机制和环境环境的共同影响(Dunst, 1980;Fisher和Corrigan, 1980;理查兹,1978;Seibert and Oiler, 1981)。临床医生的观点考虑人格变量,在非自然环境中,可能会对婴儿的学习方式产生不利影响。它承认每个婴儿都有一个独特的与世界互动的历史,这个历史为婴儿提供了各种各样的策略,用于积极解决问题的情况和交流的发展。由于临床医生关心的是残疾或高危婴儿的评估,评估方案应该从沟通的广泛定义发展而来,这将为康复提供大量的切入点。因此,婴儿的任何行为都应该被看作是在一个连续体上发生的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信