Ni’matul ’Abdah Adhiya Fakhriy, I. Ardiyanto, H. A. Nugroho, Gilang Nugraha Putu Pratama
{"title":"Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying Abscessed and Impacted Tooth: Comparison Study","authors":"Ni’matul ’Abdah Adhiya Fakhriy, I. Ardiyanto, H. A. Nugroho, Gilang Nugraha Putu Pratama","doi":"10.1109/IBIOMED.2018.8534887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a comparative study of machine learning algorithms for classifying normal, abscessed, and impacted tooth based on periapical radiograph images. Those methods are Logistic Regression (LR), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Gaussian Naive Bayes (NB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Haralick texture, Hu’s moment invariants, and color histogram are utilized to obtain the feature vector of those images. The accuracy can be calculated with 10-fold cross-validation. We also verify the accuracy of the machine learning algorithms under the various number of training images. We take 30, 45, and 60 images from three classes. Regardless the number of training images, RF keeps outperforming the others in the term of accuracy.","PeriodicalId":217196,"journal":{"name":"2018 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (IBIOMED)","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 2nd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering (IBIOMED)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IBIOMED.2018.8534887","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
This paper presents a comparative study of machine learning algorithms for classifying normal, abscessed, and impacted tooth based on periapical radiograph images. Those methods are Logistic Regression (LR), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), Gaussian Naive Bayes (NB), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). Haralick texture, Hu’s moment invariants, and color histogram are utilized to obtain the feature vector of those images. The accuracy can be calculated with 10-fold cross-validation. We also verify the accuracy of the machine learning algorithms under the various number of training images. We take 30, 45, and 60 images from three classes. Regardless the number of training images, RF keeps outperforming the others in the term of accuracy.