Pope Francis: Prophet and Priest in the Anthropocene

C. Deane‐Drummond, Cheryl Handel, K. Shields
{"title":"Pope Francis: Prophet and Priest in the Anthropocene","authors":"C. Deane‐Drummond, Cheryl Handel, K. Shields","doi":"10.5840/JCATHSOC201714217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most significant aspects of Pope Francis’ 2015 encyclical, Laudato si,’ is that it is a deep cry of the heart:Laudato si’,Praise be!My central argument in this paper is that this cry stems from Pope Francis’s charism as a prophet and priest in the epoch of the Anthropocene. The rhetoric of “irreversible changes” to the earth that is implied by the idea of the Anthropocene has struck a cultural chord way beyond its original geological scientific home by generating ongoing and heated debates in the environmental humanities. There are negative aspects in using such a term that Pope Francis manages to avoid by eschewing its use. In particular, narratives about the Anthropocene offer ambiguous portrayals of the place of humanity on the earth that has important ethical and religious consequences. These narratives edge towards a philosophical scientism beyond the confines of the geological sciencewhere the term originated. In this sense, on the one hand, they are ‘naturalistic’ in being derived from the natural sciences. On the other hand, Anthropocene narratives are also about the dominance of human beings on planet earth, hence eclipsing the category of the natural world as ‘other’","PeriodicalId":181402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Catholic Social Thought","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Catholic Social Thought","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/JCATHSOC201714217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One of the most significant aspects of Pope Francis’ 2015 encyclical, Laudato si,’ is that it is a deep cry of the heart:Laudato si’,Praise be!My central argument in this paper is that this cry stems from Pope Francis’s charism as a prophet and priest in the epoch of the Anthropocene. The rhetoric of “irreversible changes” to the earth that is implied by the idea of the Anthropocene has struck a cultural chord way beyond its original geological scientific home by generating ongoing and heated debates in the environmental humanities. There are negative aspects in using such a term that Pope Francis manages to avoid by eschewing its use. In particular, narratives about the Anthropocene offer ambiguous portrayals of the place of humanity on the earth that has important ethical and religious consequences. These narratives edge towards a philosophical scientism beyond the confines of the geological sciencewhere the term originated. In this sense, on the one hand, they are ‘naturalistic’ in being derived from the natural sciences. On the other hand, Anthropocene narratives are also about the dominance of human beings on planet earth, hence eclipsing the category of the natural world as ‘other’
教宗方济各:人类世的先知和神父
教宗方济各2015年的通谕《愿祢受赞颂》(Laudato si)中最重要的一个方面是,它是内心深处的呼喊:“愿祢受赞颂!”我在本文中的中心论点是,这种呐喊源于教皇方济各作为人类世时代的先知和牧师的魅力。“人类世”概念所暗示的地球“不可逆转的变化”的修辞,在环境人文学科中引发了持续而激烈的辩论,从而在其最初的地质科学领域之外,引发了一种文化共鸣。教皇方济各试图通过避免使用这个词来避免使用这个词的负面影响。特别是,关于人类世的叙述对人类在地球上的位置提供了模棱两可的描述,这具有重要的伦理和宗教后果。这些叙述趋向于一种超越地质科学范畴的哲学科学主义,而地质科学正是这个术语的发源地。在这个意义上,一方面,它们是“自然主义的”,因为它们来源于自然科学。另一方面,人类世的叙述也是关于人类在地球上的统治地位,因此使自然世界的范畴黯然失色,成为“他者”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信