The Jury and Pleading

J. Baker
{"title":"The Jury and Pleading","authors":"J. Baker","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198812609.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter concentrates on the jury and the history of pleading, which was at the heart of the common-law system. Pleading was the means of defining a factual issue which could be tried by jury. In medieval times pleadings were framed orally, and most legal argument occurred at the pre-trial stage. In the Tudor period this was turned round: pleadings were settled in writing, and legal arguments took place once the facts had been found. Special verdicts enabled more facts to be put before the judges than were in the pleadings. The change was dependent on the ‘motions in banc’, particularly the motion in arrest of judgment, and later the motion for a new trial, which worked like a modern appeal save that they took place before judgment. The effect of dispensing with civil juries is considered, and the chapter ends with an account of procedural reforms.","PeriodicalId":321735,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to English Legal History","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Introduction to English Legal History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198812609.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter concentrates on the jury and the history of pleading, which was at the heart of the common-law system. Pleading was the means of defining a factual issue which could be tried by jury. In medieval times pleadings were framed orally, and most legal argument occurred at the pre-trial stage. In the Tudor period this was turned round: pleadings were settled in writing, and legal arguments took place once the facts had been found. Special verdicts enabled more facts to be put before the judges than were in the pleadings. The change was dependent on the ‘motions in banc’, particularly the motion in arrest of judgment, and later the motion for a new trial, which worked like a modern appeal save that they took place before judgment. The effect of dispensing with civil juries is considered, and the chapter ends with an account of procedural reforms.
陪审团与辩诉
本章主要讨论陪审团和辩诉的历史,这是普通法制度的核心。辩诉是确定事实问题的一种手段,可以由陪审团审理。在中世纪,诉状是口头形成的,大多数法律辩论发生在审前阶段。在都铎王朝时期,情况发生了逆转:诉状以书面形式解决,一旦发现事实,就开始进行法律辩论。特别判决书使更多的事实摆在法官面前,而不是诉状中。这种变化取决于“在案动议”,特别是撤销判决的动议,以及后来的重新审判动议,这就像现代的上诉一样,只是它们发生在判决之前。本章讨论了取消民事陪审团的影响,并以程序改革的叙述结束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信