European Integration and the Western Balkans – What Now?

Ivca Bocevski
{"title":"European Integration and the Western Balkans – What Now?","authors":"Ivca Bocevski","doi":"10.47706/kkifpr.2023.1.9-20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is there a real perspective for the full integration of the Western Balkans Six in the European Union, or is the accession process already dead? “Something is rotten in the state of the European integration of the Western Balkans” is not just a poetic way to describe the state of affairs regarding full accession, but a reality. The European Union, and previously the European Economic Community, was quite efficient in previous cycles of European enlargement. Virtually all the accession processes were completed within the mandate of a single European Commission once the negotiation processes had been started with the respective countries. Furthermore, in the pre-accession period the European Union invested heavily in the removal of the “non-acquis political criteria,” which were usually linked to the democratic insufficiencies of the candidate countries. The only notable exceptions to the ‘rule of a single European Commission’ are the Turkish enlargement and the Western Balkans Six (WB6) accession process. Given the fact that most of the WB6 countries already have the necessary legal framework in place for cooperation with the EU and that the single market is by far the largest trading partner of the region, the only logical conclusion is that there is no political will for further enlargement of the European Union, and so the accession process has ground to a halt.","PeriodicalId":365676,"journal":{"name":"Foreign Policy Review","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foreign Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47706/kkifpr.2023.1.9-20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Is there a real perspective for the full integration of the Western Balkans Six in the European Union, or is the accession process already dead? “Something is rotten in the state of the European integration of the Western Balkans” is not just a poetic way to describe the state of affairs regarding full accession, but a reality. The European Union, and previously the European Economic Community, was quite efficient in previous cycles of European enlargement. Virtually all the accession processes were completed within the mandate of a single European Commission once the negotiation processes had been started with the respective countries. Furthermore, in the pre-accession period the European Union invested heavily in the removal of the “non-acquis political criteria,” which were usually linked to the democratic insufficiencies of the candidate countries. The only notable exceptions to the ‘rule of a single European Commission’ are the Turkish enlargement and the Western Balkans Six (WB6) accession process. Given the fact that most of the WB6 countries already have the necessary legal framework in place for cooperation with the EU and that the single market is by far the largest trading partner of the region, the only logical conclusion is that there is no political will for further enlargement of the European Union, and so the accession process has ground to a halt.
欧洲一体化与西巴尔干——现在怎么办?
西巴尔干六国完全融入欧盟是否存在真正的前景,或者加入欧盟的进程已经死亡?“西巴尔干地区的欧洲一体化进程中有些东西已经腐烂了”,这不仅是对完全加入欧盟的事态的诗意描述,而且是一个现实。欧盟,以及之前的欧洲经济共同体,在之前的欧洲扩张周期中效率相当高。一旦与各国开始谈判进程,几乎所有的加入进程都是在一个欧洲委员会的授权范围内完成的。此外,在加入前阶段,欧洲联盟在取消“非获得性政治标准”方面投入了大量资金,这些标准通常与候选国的民主不足有关。“单一欧盟委员会的规则”唯一值得注意的例外是土耳其的扩大和西巴尔干六国(WB6)的加入进程。考虑到大多数WB6国家已经具备了与欧盟合作的必要法律框架,而且单一市场是该地区迄今为止最大的贸易伙伴,唯一合乎逻辑的结论是,没有进一步扩大欧盟的政治意愿,因此加入欧盟的进程已经停滞不前。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信