Teaching surgical skills in a resource-limited setting: Comparing massed versus distributed practice in an ultrasound-guided breast biopsy simulator

Robert Munyaneza, Allison N. Martin, R. Riviello, E. Abahuje, S. Murthy, F. Ntirenganya
{"title":"Teaching surgical skills in a resource-limited setting: Comparing massed versus distributed practice in an ultrasound-guided breast biopsy simulator","authors":"Robert Munyaneza, Allison N. Martin, R. Riviello, E. Abahuje, S. Murthy, F. Ntirenganya","doi":"10.4314/ecajs.v23i3.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Teaching surgical skills in the simulation lab has increased markedly compared to teaching only in the operating room. Although many studies have been performed investigating the optimal teaching methodology for skills acquisition, there is no consensus on the best method. Massed and distributed practices are important methods in teaching procedural skills. Considering the limited human and logistical resources in low and middle-income settings, it is valuable to understand the optimal methodology for learning and acquiring surgical skills. Methods: Thirty-two core needle biopsy-naïve first-year residents and final year medical students rotating in general surgery were enrolled in and completed the study at University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, a tertiary, teaching and referral hospital in Kigali, Rwanda. They were assigned to a “massed” group (i.e., one time, 3-hour practice) or “distributed” group (i.e., 1-hour practice per week for 3 weeks). Trainees were taught ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy on a high-fidelity breast simulator. All participants completed pre- and post-tests and an evaluation of skill retention was performed one month after completion of the training. Analysis of performance was completed, and p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no difference between performance on the pretest (p=0.985) and the posttest (p=0.680). Both groups demonstrated improvement after implementation of the simulation training when comparing pretest and posttest results (p<0.001); there were no differences in the evaluation of skills retention after one month after the training between the two groups (p=0.273). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that both groups have improved significantly their knowledge and skills. Trainees have similar retention of skills in ultrasound guided core needle biopsy on a breast simulator whether trained under a massed or distributed practice schedule. Both methods may be considered in our setting for teaching surgical skills. Keywords: surgical simulation; resource-limited setting; global surgery ","PeriodicalId":302666,"journal":{"name":"East and Central African Journal of Surgery","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East and Central African Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ecajs.v23i3.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Teaching surgical skills in the simulation lab has increased markedly compared to teaching only in the operating room. Although many studies have been performed investigating the optimal teaching methodology for skills acquisition, there is no consensus on the best method. Massed and distributed practices are important methods in teaching procedural skills. Considering the limited human and logistical resources in low and middle-income settings, it is valuable to understand the optimal methodology for learning and acquiring surgical skills. Methods: Thirty-two core needle biopsy-naïve first-year residents and final year medical students rotating in general surgery were enrolled in and completed the study at University Teaching Hospital of Kigali, a tertiary, teaching and referral hospital in Kigali, Rwanda. They were assigned to a “massed” group (i.e., one time, 3-hour practice) or “distributed” group (i.e., 1-hour practice per week for 3 weeks). Trainees were taught ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy on a high-fidelity breast simulator. All participants completed pre- and post-tests and an evaluation of skill retention was performed one month after completion of the training. Analysis of performance was completed, and p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was no difference between performance on the pretest (p=0.985) and the posttest (p=0.680). Both groups demonstrated improvement after implementation of the simulation training when comparing pretest and posttest results (p<0.001); there were no differences in the evaluation of skills retention after one month after the training between the two groups (p=0.273). Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that both groups have improved significantly their knowledge and skills. Trainees have similar retention of skills in ultrasound guided core needle biopsy on a breast simulator whether trained under a massed or distributed practice schedule. Both methods may be considered in our setting for teaching surgical skills. Keywords: surgical simulation; resource-limited setting; global surgery 
在资源有限的环境中教授外科技能:超声引导乳腺活检模拟器中集中与分散实践的比较
背景:与仅在手术室进行的教学相比,在模拟实验室进行的外科技能教学有了明显的提高。尽管已经进行了许多研究来调查技能习得的最佳教学方法,但对于最佳方法并没有达成共识。集中、分散的实践是程序性技能教学的重要方法。考虑到低收入和中等收入环境中有限的人力和后勤资源,了解学习和获得外科技能的最佳方法是有价值的。方法:32名核心针biopsy-naïve一年级住院医师和最后一年级普通外科轮转医科学生在卢旺达基加利大学教学医院完成了研究。基加利大学教学医院是卢旺达基加利的一家三级教学和转诊医院。他们被分配到“集中”组(即一次练习3小时)或“分散”组(即每周练习1小时,持续3周)。学员在高保真乳房模拟器上接受超声引导下的核心穿刺活检。所有参与者都完成了前后测试,并在培训结束一个月后进行了技能保留评估。完成性能分析,p值≤0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:前测与后测成绩差异无统计学意义(p=0.985)。当比较测试前和测试后的结果时,两组在实施模拟训练后都表现出改善(p<0.001);两组在训练后1个月的技能保留评估无差异(p=0.273)。结论:本研究结果表明,两组学生的知识和技能均有显著提高。受训者在乳房模拟器上超声引导下的核心穿刺活检术中,无论是在集中还是分散的练习计划下训练,都有类似的技能保留。这两种方法在我们的外科技能教学中都可以考虑。关键词:手术模拟;资源有限的设置;全球手术
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信