Analysis of Pre-service Secondary Chemistry Teachers' Uses of Teacher's Guide in Planning Lessons

Chanho Yang, N. Song, Minhwa Kim, Taehee Noh
{"title":"Analysis of Pre-service Secondary Chemistry Teachers' Uses of Teacher's Guide in Planning Lessons","authors":"Chanho Yang, N. Song, Minhwa Kim, Taehee Noh","doi":"10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we investigated pre-service secondary chemistry teachers’ use of teacher’s guide in planning lessons. Eleven pre-service teachers at a college of education in Seoul participated in this study. Textbooks and teacher’s guide books including various teaching materials were provided. Pre-service teachers used teacher’s guide while they planned two lessons, which were a lecture and an instruction using science teaching model. A semi-structured interview was conducted. All of the teaching-learning materials and interviews were analyzed. The analyses of the results revealed that most pre-service teachers followed each lesson presented in teacher’s guide, but they did not consider the structure of the whole unit and science curriculum. There were some cases that the exemplary lesson planning in teacher’s guide helped them to select science teaching model. They modified the questions of textbook activity in planning their lecture. On the other hand, they modified the activity to fit each stage of the model in planning their instruction using science teaching models. Most pre-service teachers constructed their own worksheets by applying the materials of the teacher’s guide. They recognized the components of assessment by considering exemplary lesson planning from the teacher’s guide, and created questions by modifying the content of textbooks and teacher’s guide books including various teaching materials. However, the questions which they made were limited in context of knowledge. They evaluated that introductory questions were not of interest to students, and modified or added new materials. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":107400,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.4.0681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we investigated pre-service secondary chemistry teachers’ use of teacher’s guide in planning lessons. Eleven pre-service teachers at a college of education in Seoul participated in this study. Textbooks and teacher’s guide books including various teaching materials were provided. Pre-service teachers used teacher’s guide while they planned two lessons, which were a lecture and an instruction using science teaching model. A semi-structured interview was conducted. All of the teaching-learning materials and interviews were analyzed. The analyses of the results revealed that most pre-service teachers followed each lesson presented in teacher’s guide, but they did not consider the structure of the whole unit and science curriculum. There were some cases that the exemplary lesson planning in teacher’s guide helped them to select science teaching model. They modified the questions of textbook activity in planning their lecture. On the other hand, they modified the activity to fit each stage of the model in planning their instruction using science teaching models. Most pre-service teachers constructed their own worksheets by applying the materials of the teacher’s guide. They recognized the components of assessment by considering exemplary lesson planning from the teacher’s guide, and created questions by modifying the content of textbooks and teacher’s guide books including various teaching materials. However, the questions which they made were limited in context of knowledge. They evaluated that introductory questions were not of interest to students, and modified or added new materials. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.
职前中学化学教师在策划课程中使用教师导师表的分析
本研究旨在调查职前中学化学教师使用教师导师制策划课程的情况。首尔某教育学院的11名职前教师参与了这项研究。提供教材和教师指南,包括各种教材。职前教师采用教师导师制,采用科学教学模式规划了讲座和教学两节课。进行了半结构化访谈。对所有的教学资料和访谈进行分析。对结果的分析显示,大多数职前教师遵循教师指南中的每节课,但他们没有考虑整个单元和科学课程的结构。教师导论中的示范性教案有助于教师选择科学教学模式。他们在计划讲座时修改了课本活动的问题。另一方面,他们修改活动以适应模型的每个阶段,以规划他们使用科学教学模型的教学。大多数职前教师通过应用教师指南中的材料来构建自己的工作表。他们考虑了教师指南中的示范课程计划,确定了评价的组成部分,并修改了包括各种教材在内的教科书和教师指南的内容,提出了问题。然而,他们提出的问题在知识范围内是有限的。他们认为学生对介绍性问题不感兴趣,并修改或增加了新的材料。讨论了这些发现的教育意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信