The gap between macroeconomic and microeconomic health resources allocation decisions: The case of nurses.

M. Igoumenidis, P. Kiekkas, E. Papastavrou
{"title":"The gap between macroeconomic and microeconomic health resources allocation decisions: The case of nurses.","authors":"M. Igoumenidis, P. Kiekkas, E. Papastavrou","doi":"10.1111/nup.12283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The allocation of healthcare resources takes place at two distinct levels. At the macroeconomic level, policymakers decide on budgets, staffing, cost-effectiveness thresholds, clinical guidelines and insurance payments; at the microeconomic level, healthcare professionals decide on whom to treat, what the appropriate treatment is, how much time and effort should each patient receive and how urgent the need for care is. At both levels, there is a constant social need for just allocation. Policymakers are mostly guided by abstract principles of justice, thinking in terms of groups of patients, epidemiological data, impersonal statistics and economic costs. On the other hand, healthcare professionals understand the need for justice at a more personal level, as they interact with patients and, in a sense, put theory into practice. Nurses hold a unique position in healthcare systems, as, traditionally, they are closer to patients than other health professionals. This means that they have a firsthand view of the effect that their decisions have on specific patients and, therefore, nurses tend to get more influenced by their personal feelings, values and beliefs at the microeconomic level. This presentation shall examine the gap between abstract macroeconomic and concrete microeconomic health resources allocation decisions, with a particular emphasis on the role of the nurse.","PeriodicalId":391694,"journal":{"name":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The allocation of healthcare resources takes place at two distinct levels. At the macroeconomic level, policymakers decide on budgets, staffing, cost-effectiveness thresholds, clinical guidelines and insurance payments; at the microeconomic level, healthcare professionals decide on whom to treat, what the appropriate treatment is, how much time and effort should each patient receive and how urgent the need for care is. At both levels, there is a constant social need for just allocation. Policymakers are mostly guided by abstract principles of justice, thinking in terms of groups of patients, epidemiological data, impersonal statistics and economic costs. On the other hand, healthcare professionals understand the need for justice at a more personal level, as they interact with patients and, in a sense, put theory into practice. Nurses hold a unique position in healthcare systems, as, traditionally, they are closer to patients than other health professionals. This means that they have a firsthand view of the effect that their decisions have on specific patients and, therefore, nurses tend to get more influenced by their personal feelings, values and beliefs at the microeconomic level. This presentation shall examine the gap between abstract macroeconomic and concrete microeconomic health resources allocation decisions, with a particular emphasis on the role of the nurse.
宏观经济和微观经济卫生资源分配决策之间的差距:以护士为例。
医疗保健资源的分配在两个不同的层次上进行。在宏观经济层面,决策者决定预算、人员配备、成本效益阈值、临床指南和保险支付;在微观经济层面上,医疗保健专业人员决定治疗对象、适当的治疗方法、每个病人应该花多少时间和精力,以及对护理的需求有多迫切。在这两个层面上,都存在着公正分配的社会需求。决策者大多以抽象的正义原则为指导,从患者群体、流行病学数据、非个人统计数据和经济成本的角度进行思考。另一方面,医疗保健专业人员理解在更个人的层面上需要正义,因为他们与患者互动,从某种意义上说,把理论付诸实践。护士在卫生保健系统中占有独特的地位,因为传统上,她们比其他卫生专业人员更接近患者。这意味着他们对自己的决定对特定患者的影响有第一手的看法,因此,护士往往在微观经济层面上更容易受到个人感受、价值观和信仰的影响。本报告将探讨抽象的宏观经济和具体的微观经济卫生资源分配决策之间的差距,特别强调护士的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信