Activation of Defense Mechanisms in the Nudibranchs Peltodoris nobilis and Hermissenda crassicornis

Siena Joy
{"title":"Activation of Defense Mechanisms in the Nudibranchs Peltodoris nobilis and Hermissenda crassicornis","authors":"Siena Joy","doi":"10.5399/uo/ourj/20.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nudibranchs are marine invertebrates that use various defenses to deter predators. Peltodoris nobilis is a member of the superfamily Doridoidea and uses de novo chemical synthesis for defense. Hermissenda crassicornis is a member of the superfamily Aeolidioidea and uses nematocyst sequestration for defense. Past research explains the function and evolution of defenses in nudibranchs; however, it is unknown whether these defenses are active or passive. The goal of this research was to determine if the defense mechanisms in P. nobilis and H. crassicornis are active or passive and if one method is more effective at preventing predation than the other. It was hypothesized that the activation of defense mechanisms in both nudibranch species was active and that the defenses were equally effective at preventing predation. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the contact times of a juvenile Glebocarcinus oregonensis crab— a predator of nudibranchs—with an anesthetized and non-anesthetized nudibranch. There was no statistical difference in crab contact times between the anesthetized and control P. nobilis nudibranchs; however, the anesthetized H. crassicornis contact times with the crabs were statistically higher than the control. This suggests that the release of chemicals produced de novo in P. nobilis is passive, while the firing of sequestered nematocyst by H. crassicornis is active. The results also indicated that the control H. crassicornis contact times with the crabs were statistically lower than those of P. nobilis; however, the crabs demonstrated little predatory behavior across all trials. Therefore, this study cannot conclusively determine which defense mechanism is more effective at preventing predation.","PeriodicalId":338305,"journal":{"name":"Oregon Undergraduate Research Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oregon Undergraduate Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5399/uo/ourj/20.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nudibranchs are marine invertebrates that use various defenses to deter predators. Peltodoris nobilis is a member of the superfamily Doridoidea and uses de novo chemical synthesis for defense. Hermissenda crassicornis is a member of the superfamily Aeolidioidea and uses nematocyst sequestration for defense. Past research explains the function and evolution of defenses in nudibranchs; however, it is unknown whether these defenses are active or passive. The goal of this research was to determine if the defense mechanisms in P. nobilis and H. crassicornis are active or passive and if one method is more effective at preventing predation than the other. It was hypothesized that the activation of defense mechanisms in both nudibranch species was active and that the defenses were equally effective at preventing predation. This hypothesis was tested by comparing the contact times of a juvenile Glebocarcinus oregonensis crab— a predator of nudibranchs—with an anesthetized and non-anesthetized nudibranch. There was no statistical difference in crab contact times between the anesthetized and control P. nobilis nudibranchs; however, the anesthetized H. crassicornis contact times with the crabs were statistically higher than the control. This suggests that the release of chemicals produced de novo in P. nobilis is passive, while the firing of sequestered nematocyst by H. crassicornis is active. The results also indicated that the control H. crassicornis contact times with the crabs were statistically lower than those of P. nobilis; however, the crabs demonstrated little predatory behavior across all trials. Therefore, this study cannot conclusively determine which defense mechanism is more effective at preventing predation.
黄颡鱼和棘棘鱼防御机制的激活
裸鳃动物是海洋无脊椎动物,它们使用各种防御手段来阻止捕食者。Peltodoris nobilis是Doridoidea超家族的成员,使用从头化学合成来防御。带角Hermissenda crassicornis是风蛾总科的一员,利用刺丝囊隔离进行防御。过去的研究解释了裸鳃动物防御的功能和进化;然而,尚不清楚这些防御是主动的还是被动的。本研究的目的是为了确定大角瓢虫和甲角瓢虫的防御机制是主动的还是被动的,以及一种方法是否比另一种方法更有效地防止捕食。据推测,这两种裸鳃动物的防御机制都是活跃的,并且防御在防止捕食方面同样有效。这一假设是通过比较幼年俄勒冈Glebocarcinus oregonensis蟹(裸鳃蟹的捕食者)与麻醉和未麻醉裸鳃蟹的接触时间来验证的。麻醉组与对照组接触蟹次数无统计学差异;麻醉后的甲角蜱接触蟹的次数明显高于对照组。这表明,大叶蝉体内新产生的化学物质的释放是被动的,而天蚕对被隔离的刺丝囊的发射是主动的。结果还表明,对照的甲角蜱与大闸蟹的接触次数明显低于黄颡鱼;然而,在所有的试验中,螃蟹几乎没有表现出捕食行为。因此,本研究不能最终确定哪种防御机制在防止捕食方面更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信