The Smart City Concept in the Experts’ and Residents’ Perception: Problems and Contradictions in the Concept Implementation

A. V. Pirotskaya
{"title":"The Smart City Concept in the Experts’ and Residents’ Perception: Problems and Contradictions in the Concept Implementation","authors":"A. V. Pirotskaya","doi":"10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-2-178-196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Smart city technologies are designed to make human life easier and more comfortable. However, in reality, there haven’t yet been developed unambiguous criteria for measuring the effectiveness of smart city initiatives. This means that the city residents’ needs fade into the background. Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify the main problems and contradictions that impede the introduction and dissemination of smart city technologies in existing Russian cities. This article uses such techniques as expert interviews (with municipal representative, IT businessman, sociologist, economist and urban researcher) as well as semi-formalized interviews with residents of Novosibirsk. The study describes key measurements of the smart city effectiveness (Physical environment, Society, Government, Technology & Data) and examines in detail two of them: Society and Government. The research also indicates the main problems and obstacles to the effective implementation of the smart city program for each of these dimensions. The study has scientific importance, as it describes the contradictions between government and society when trying to introduce smart technologies. Also the results of the study may help IT companies to pay attention on people’s needs when developing and promoting smart applications and services.","PeriodicalId":344304,"journal":{"name":"Wem-water Engineering & Management","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wem-water Engineering & Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/2542-0429-2020-20-2-178-196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Smart city technologies are designed to make human life easier and more comfortable. However, in reality, there haven’t yet been developed unambiguous criteria for measuring the effectiveness of smart city initiatives. This means that the city residents’ needs fade into the background. Therefore, the aim of the study is to identify the main problems and contradictions that impede the introduction and dissemination of smart city technologies in existing Russian cities. This article uses such techniques as expert interviews (with municipal representative, IT businessman, sociologist, economist and urban researcher) as well as semi-formalized interviews with residents of Novosibirsk. The study describes key measurements of the smart city effectiveness (Physical environment, Society, Government, Technology & Data) and examines in detail two of them: Society and Government. The research also indicates the main problems and obstacles to the effective implementation of the smart city program for each of these dimensions. The study has scientific importance, as it describes the contradictions between government and society when trying to introduce smart technologies. Also the results of the study may help IT companies to pay attention on people’s needs when developing and promoting smart applications and services.
专家与居民认知中的智慧城市理念:理念实施中的问题与矛盾
智慧城市技术旨在使人类的生活更轻松、更舒适。然而,在现实中,还没有制定出明确的标准来衡量智慧城市倡议的有效性。这意味着城市居民的需求被淡化到背景中。因此,本研究的目的是找出阻碍俄罗斯现有城市引入和传播智慧城市技术的主要问题和矛盾。本文采用了专家访谈(与市政代表、IT商人、社会学家、经济学家和城市研究人员)以及对新西伯利亚居民的半正式访谈等技术。该研究描述了智慧城市有效性的关键衡量标准(物理环境,社会,政府,技术和数据),并详细检查了其中两个:社会和政府。研究还指出了有效实施这些维度的智慧城市计划的主要问题和障碍。这项研究具有重要的科学意义,因为它描述了政府和社会在试图引入智能技术时的矛盾。研究结果亦有助资讯科技公司在发展及推广智能应用及服务时,关注市民的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信