A benchmarking for public information by Machine Learning and Regular Language

F. A. D. G. Pinto, J. D. B. Santos, Sérgio Lifschitz, E. Haeusler
{"title":"A benchmarking for public information by Machine Learning and Regular Language","authors":"F. A. D. G. Pinto, J. D. B. Santos, Sérgio Lifschitz, E. Haeusler","doi":"10.5753/wcge.2023.229975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technologies such as Big Data and Transfer Learning have been attracting the interest of industry and academia over the last 15 years. The consequence of this is an almost unanimous preference for technological solutions that use statistical models. This technology is causing a revolution in the information extraction process. In this research, we question whether this technique is the best solution for extracting information from documents. We compare machine learning (ML) and rule-based approaches in the task of recognizing legal entities in the official gazette. We built an annotated dataset with 100 examples of legal documents and submitted this model to an evaluation in IBM Watson Knowledge Studio (WKS). We show that, in a scenario where documents follow a formal structure, rules-based information extraction systems still present themselves as low-cost, more uncomplicated, and more efficient solutions.","PeriodicalId":108828,"journal":{"name":"Anais do XI Workshop de Computação Aplicada em Governo Eletrônico (WCGE 2023)","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do XI Workshop de Computação Aplicada em Governo Eletrônico (WCGE 2023)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/wcge.2023.229975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Technologies such as Big Data and Transfer Learning have been attracting the interest of industry and academia over the last 15 years. The consequence of this is an almost unanimous preference for technological solutions that use statistical models. This technology is causing a revolution in the information extraction process. In this research, we question whether this technique is the best solution for extracting information from documents. We compare machine learning (ML) and rule-based approaches in the task of recognizing legal entities in the official gazette. We built an annotated dataset with 100 examples of legal documents and submitted this model to an evaluation in IBM Watson Knowledge Studio (WKS). We show that, in a scenario where documents follow a formal structure, rules-based information extraction systems still present themselves as low-cost, more uncomplicated, and more efficient solutions.
基于机器学习和规则语言的公共信息基准测试
在过去的15年里,大数据和迁移学习等技术吸引了工业界和学术界的兴趣。其结果是,人们几乎一致倾向于使用统计模型的技术解决方案。这项技术正在引发一场信息提取过程的革命。在这项研究中,我们质疑这种技术是否是从文档中提取信息的最佳解决方案。我们比较了机器学习(ML)和基于规则的方法在官方公报中识别法律实体的任务。我们建立了一个带有100个法律文件示例的带注释的数据集,并将该模型提交给IBM沃森知识工作室(WKS)进行评估。我们表明,在文档遵循正式结构的场景中,基于规则的信息提取系统仍然表现为低成本、更简单、更有效的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信