Evaluation of checkpoint mechanisms for massively parallel machines

T. Chiueh, Peitao Deng
{"title":"Evaluation of checkpoint mechanisms for massively parallel machines","authors":"T. Chiueh, Peitao Deng","doi":"10.1109/FTCS.1996.534622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Massively parallel machines typically contain thousands of processor units and therefore are more likely to suffer system breakdown because of component failures. This paper studies efficient diskless checkpointing mechanisms for SIMD massively parallel machines. Three checkpointing schemes: mirror checkpointing, parity checkpointing, and partial parity checkpointing are compared in terms of their checkpoint performance and storage overheads, based on empirical measurements. Mirror checkpointing and parity checkpointing schemes have been successfully implemented and tested on a DECmpp 12000 machine, without hardware or OS modifications. It has been shown that mirror checkpointing is an order of magnitude faster than parity checkpointing, but takes twice as much storage overhead. Partial parity checkpointing, although significantly reduces the storage overhead, could lead to unpredictable execution performance. This paper also examines the detailed storage/performance tradeoffs for partial parity checkpointing through manual instrumentation, and describes the implementation experience from these experiments.","PeriodicalId":191163,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of Annual Symposium on Fault Tolerant Computing","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"63","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of Annual Symposium on Fault Tolerant Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FTCS.1996.534622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 63

Abstract

Massively parallel machines typically contain thousands of processor units and therefore are more likely to suffer system breakdown because of component failures. This paper studies efficient diskless checkpointing mechanisms for SIMD massively parallel machines. Three checkpointing schemes: mirror checkpointing, parity checkpointing, and partial parity checkpointing are compared in terms of their checkpoint performance and storage overheads, based on empirical measurements. Mirror checkpointing and parity checkpointing schemes have been successfully implemented and tested on a DECmpp 12000 machine, without hardware or OS modifications. It has been shown that mirror checkpointing is an order of magnitude faster than parity checkpointing, but takes twice as much storage overhead. Partial parity checkpointing, although significantly reduces the storage overhead, could lead to unpredictable execution performance. This paper also examines the detailed storage/performance tradeoffs for partial parity checkpointing through manual instrumentation, and describes the implementation experience from these experiments.
大规模并行机器检查点机制的评估
大规模并行机器通常包含数千个处理器单元,因此更有可能由于组件故障而导致系统崩溃。本文研究了SIMD大规模并行机的高效无磁盘检查点机制。三种检查点方案:镜像检查点、奇偶性检查点和部分奇偶性检查点在检查点性能和存储开销方面进行了比较,基于经验测量。镜像检查点和奇偶校验方案已经在DECmpp 12000机器上成功实现和测试,没有硬件或操作系统的修改。已经证明,镜像检查点比奇偶校验点快一个数量级,但需要两倍的存储开销。部分奇偶校验点虽然显著降低了存储开销,但可能导致不可预测的执行性能。本文还通过手动检测详细检查了部分奇偶校验点的存储/性能权衡,并描述了这些实验的实现经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信