The Impact of Pre-service Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs on Teaching Science as Inquiry: A Silent Antagonist for Effective Inquiry-Based Science Lessons

Witchayda Nawanidbumrung, Sara Samiphak, Noriyuki Inoue
{"title":"The Impact of Pre-service Teachers’ Pedagogical Beliefs on Teaching Science as Inquiry: A Silent Antagonist for Effective Inquiry-Based Science Lessons","authors":"Witchayda Nawanidbumrung, Sara Samiphak, Noriyuki Inoue","doi":"10.33828/sei.v33.i1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Teachers’ beliefs are strong predictors of their practices. They guide how teachers understand the implementation of effective inquiry-based lessons. The cross-case analysis indicated that the fundamental problems observed in many Thai pre-service science teachers’ classroom inquiries stemmed from their beliefs on teaching science. Although the teachers agreed on the importance of having students engage in scientific inquiry through hands-on activities, they believed that its purpose was to help students’ sense-making of what the teachers told them. They believed an emphasis should be placed on asking as many knowledge questions as they would like, providing answers, giving procedural instructions to students, and offering specifics of what students should observe in the hands-on activities. The teachers believed that these were effective avenues to help students gain scientific knowledge in terms of concrete experiences. The observed lessons evidenced that teachers failed to elicit students’ interest, curiosity, and engagement in inquiry lessons. This study suggests that pre-service teachers’ benefits from being provided with real-world opportunities to reflect on their educational beliefs and get suitable supports to transform their beliefs for delivering inquiry-based science lessons.","PeriodicalId":156311,"journal":{"name":"Science Education International","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Education International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Teachers’ beliefs are strong predictors of their practices. They guide how teachers understand the implementation of effective inquiry-based lessons. The cross-case analysis indicated that the fundamental problems observed in many Thai pre-service science teachers’ classroom inquiries stemmed from their beliefs on teaching science. Although the teachers agreed on the importance of having students engage in scientific inquiry through hands-on activities, they believed that its purpose was to help students’ sense-making of what the teachers told them. They believed an emphasis should be placed on asking as many knowledge questions as they would like, providing answers, giving procedural instructions to students, and offering specifics of what students should observe in the hands-on activities. The teachers believed that these were effective avenues to help students gain scientific knowledge in terms of concrete experiences. The observed lessons evidenced that teachers failed to elicit students’ interest, curiosity, and engagement in inquiry lessons. This study suggests that pre-service teachers’ benefits from being provided with real-world opportunities to reflect on their educational beliefs and get suitable supports to transform their beliefs for delivering inquiry-based science lessons.
职前教师的教学信念对研究性科学教学的影响:有效的研究性科学课程的无声对抗者
教师的信念是其实践的有力预测因素。它们指导教师如何理解有效的探究性课程的实施。交叉案例分析表明,许多泰国职前科学教师课堂询问的根本问题源于他们对科学教学的信念。虽然老师们同意让学生通过动手活动参与科学探究的重要性,但他们认为这样做的目的是帮助学生理解老师告诉他们的内容。他们认为重点应该放在提出尽可能多的知识问题,提供答案,给学生提供程序指导,并提供学生在实践活动中应该观察到的细节。老师们认为这些是帮助学生以具体经验获得科学知识的有效途径。观察到的课程证明,教师在探究性课程中未能引起学生的兴趣、好奇心和参与度。本研究提示职前教师受益于提供真实世界的机会来反思他们的教育信念,并获得适当的支持,以改变他们的信念,以提供探究性科学课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信