The relationship between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court in the light of Resolution 1422 (2002)

O. Elias, Anne-Floor B E Quast
{"title":"The relationship between the Security Council and the International Criminal Court in the light of Resolution 1422 (2002)","authors":"O. Elias, Anne-Floor B E Quast","doi":"10.1163/157180703322765049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On 12 July 2002, the Security Council adopted Resolution 1422, in which it requested that the International Criminal Court (\"ICC\") not commence or proceed with the investigation or prosecution of any case that may arise concerning acts or omissions relating to an operation established or authorized by the United Nations involving current or former officials or personnel from a state contributing to that operation which is not a party to the Statute of the ICC (or \"the Rome Statute\"). This request was stated to have been made \"consistent with the provisions of Article 16 of the Rome Statute\", which allows the Security Council to make requests in resolutions adopted under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter deferring any investigation or prosecution at the ICC for a period of twelve months. The aim of this paper is to examine the compatibility of Resolution 1422 with the conditions required under article 16 of the Rome Statute, within the broader context of the relationship between the Security Council and the ICC.","PeriodicalId":399071,"journal":{"name":"Non-state Actors and International Law","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Non-state Actors and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/157180703322765049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

On 12 July 2002, the Security Council adopted Resolution 1422, in which it requested that the International Criminal Court ("ICC") not commence or proceed with the investigation or prosecution of any case that may arise concerning acts or omissions relating to an operation established or authorized by the United Nations involving current or former officials or personnel from a state contributing to that operation which is not a party to the Statute of the ICC (or "the Rome Statute"). This request was stated to have been made "consistent with the provisions of Article 16 of the Rome Statute", which allows the Security Council to make requests in resolutions adopted under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter deferring any investigation or prosecution at the ICC for a period of twelve months. The aim of this paper is to examine the compatibility of Resolution 1422 with the conditions required under article 16 of the Rome Statute, within the broader context of the relationship between the Security Council and the ICC.
根据第1422(2002)号决议,安全理事会与国际刑事法院的关系
2002年7月12日,安全理事会通过了第1422号决议,要求国际刑事法院(“国际刑事法院”)不开始或着手调查或起诉与联合国设立或授权的行动有关的任何案件,该行动涉及参与该行动的国家的现任或前任官员或人员,而这些国家不是《国际刑事法院规约》(或“罗马规约”)的缔约国。据说这项请求是“按照《罗马规约》第十六条的规定”提出的,该条允许安全理事会在根据《联合国宪章》第七章通过的决议中提出请求,将国际刑事法院的任何调查或起诉推迟十二个月。本文的目的是在安全理事会与国际刑事法院之间关系的更广泛背景下,审查第1422号决议是否符合《罗马规约》第16条所要求的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信