Functional outcome of intramedullary nailing of the femoral shaft fracture

S. Sah, Madan Gyawali, P. Kandel
{"title":"Functional outcome of intramedullary nailing of the femoral shaft fracture","authors":"S. Sah, Madan Gyawali, P. Kandel","doi":"10.3126/jmcjms.v11i2.58027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Objective: A common fracture is a femoral shaft fracture. The advantages of intramedullary interlocking nails make them the method of choice for treating femoral shaft fractures. These benefits include a small incision, minimal dissection, decreased rates of infection, nonunion, and malunion, shorter hospital stays and rehabilitation periods, excellent union, rotational stability and length maintenance, rapid recovery, and early weight-bearing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the functional findings from femoral shaft fracture intramedullary nailing.\nMaterial and Methods: This was a hospital- based, longitudinal, observational study. All patients with femoral shaft fractures admitted at UCMS-TH, Bhairahawa from the Emergency Department managed surgically from October 2019 to March 2020 were included in the study. Femoral shaft fractures with age ≥ 16 years were included while open fractures (Gustalio and Anderson type 2 and 3), pathological fractures,congenital anomaly of the affected limb, previous fracture of the affected limb were excluded. All the patients were managed surgically and followed for at least 6 months. The outcome was measured by the Thoresen scoring system at the end of 6 months.\nResults: In this study of 30 cases, the mean age was 30.47 years, male and female ratio of 2:1, the left side was affected in 18 cases, RTA was the most common mode of injury. Most of the cases were Winquist and Hansen type 2 and AO type 32B. In the majority of the cases, 27 cases (90%) had no complication while superficial infection in 2 cases and shortening was seen in 1 case. We found excellent results in 86.7% cases, good in 10% cases and fair in 3.3% cases.\nConclusion: The excellent functional outcome in terms of alignment and range of motion obtained in this study in the majority of patients makes this technique more reliable. The method of choice for femoral shaft fracture in adults was due to its low complication rate, high incidence of union, shorter hospital stay and early mobility.","PeriodicalId":329681,"journal":{"name":"Janaki Medical College Journal of Medical Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Janaki Medical College Journal of Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/jmcjms.v11i2.58027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Objective: A common fracture is a femoral shaft fracture. The advantages of intramedullary interlocking nails make them the method of choice for treating femoral shaft fractures. These benefits include a small incision, minimal dissection, decreased rates of infection, nonunion, and malunion, shorter hospital stays and rehabilitation periods, excellent union, rotational stability and length maintenance, rapid recovery, and early weight-bearing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the functional findings from femoral shaft fracture intramedullary nailing. Material and Methods: This was a hospital- based, longitudinal, observational study. All patients with femoral shaft fractures admitted at UCMS-TH, Bhairahawa from the Emergency Department managed surgically from October 2019 to March 2020 were included in the study. Femoral shaft fractures with age ≥ 16 years were included while open fractures (Gustalio and Anderson type 2 and 3), pathological fractures,congenital anomaly of the affected limb, previous fracture of the affected limb were excluded. All the patients were managed surgically and followed for at least 6 months. The outcome was measured by the Thoresen scoring system at the end of 6 months. Results: In this study of 30 cases, the mean age was 30.47 years, male and female ratio of 2:1, the left side was affected in 18 cases, RTA was the most common mode of injury. Most of the cases were Winquist and Hansen type 2 and AO type 32B. In the majority of the cases, 27 cases (90%) had no complication while superficial infection in 2 cases and shortening was seen in 1 case. We found excellent results in 86.7% cases, good in 10% cases and fair in 3.3% cases. Conclusion: The excellent functional outcome in terms of alignment and range of motion obtained in this study in the majority of patients makes this technique more reliable. The method of choice for femoral shaft fracture in adults was due to its low complication rate, high incidence of union, shorter hospital stay and early mobility.
股骨干骨折髓内钉治疗的功能效果
背景与目的:股骨干骨折是一种常见的骨折。髓内联锁钉的优点使其成为治疗股骨干骨折的首选方法。这些优点包括切口小、剥离最小、感染、不愈合和不愈合发生率降低、住院时间和康复期缩短、愈合良好、旋转稳定性和长度维持、快速恢复和早期负重。因此,本研究的目的是分析股骨骨干骨折髓内钉治疗的功能表现。材料和方法:这是一项以医院为基础的纵向观察性研究。2019年10月至2020年3月期间在UCMS-TH, Bhairahawa急诊科接受手术治疗的所有股骨骨干骨折患者均纳入研究。纳入年龄≥16岁的股骨干骨折,排除开放性骨折(Gustalio和Anderson 2型和3型)、病理性骨折、患肢先天性异常、患肢既往骨折。所有患者均行手术治疗并随访至少6个月。6个月后用Thoresen评分系统测量结果。结果:本组30例患者,平均年龄30.47岁,男女比例为2:1,左侧受累18例,RTA为最常见的损伤方式。多数病例为Winquist和Hansen 2型和AO 32B型。多数病例27例(90%)无并发症,2例出现浅表感染,1例出现缩短。优良率为86.7%,良率为10%,一般率为3.3%。结论:在本研究中,大多数患者在对准和活动范围方面获得了良好的功能结果,使该技术更加可靠。成人股骨干骨折选择的方法是由于其并发症发生率低,愈合率高,住院时间短,活动能力早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信