Accountability for Students in K-12 Online Learning: Perspectives from Michigan Stakeholders and Beyond.

Leanna M. Archambault, Kathryn Kennedy, Joseph R. Freidhoff
{"title":"Accountability for Students in K-12 Online Learning: Perspectives from Michigan Stakeholders and Beyond.","authors":"Leanna M. Archambault, Kathryn Kennedy, Joseph R. Freidhoff","doi":"10.24059/OLJ.V20I3.975","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policy surrounding K-12 online learning continues to evolve as the field grows exponentially. In Michigan, Section 21f of the State School Aid Act enacted in 2013 strengthened parents’ and students’ ability to request online courses: “A student enrolled in a district in any of grades 6 to 12 is eligible to enroll in an online course as provided for in this section.” The passing of 21f raised concerns around accountability in a choice environment. Examples of such concerns included a pervasive belief about the lack of rigor or quality in online courses, an aversion to another district educating a student for one or two courses yet remaining responsible for that student’s growth, and uncertainty about how mentors and teachers would be evaluated on their online students. Consequently, a legislative directive was issued to the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute, the research arm of Michigan Virtual University that centered on accountability. In response to that directive, Michigan stakeholders, as well as experts from other course access states and national organizations, were interviewed to better understand the conversations surrounding accountability in K-12 online learning in Michigan and beyond and to make key recommendations for moving the field forward in an informed way. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Implications for research, policy, and practice are shared.","PeriodicalId":298605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of asynchronous learning networks","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of asynchronous learning networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24059/OLJ.V20I3.975","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Policy surrounding K-12 online learning continues to evolve as the field grows exponentially. In Michigan, Section 21f of the State School Aid Act enacted in 2013 strengthened parents’ and students’ ability to request online courses: “A student enrolled in a district in any of grades 6 to 12 is eligible to enroll in an online course as provided for in this section.” The passing of 21f raised concerns around accountability in a choice environment. Examples of such concerns included a pervasive belief about the lack of rigor or quality in online courses, an aversion to another district educating a student for one or two courses yet remaining responsible for that student’s growth, and uncertainty about how mentors and teachers would be evaluated on their online students. Consequently, a legislative directive was issued to the Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute, the research arm of Michigan Virtual University that centered on accountability. In response to that directive, Michigan stakeholders, as well as experts from other course access states and national organizations, were interviewed to better understand the conversations surrounding accountability in K-12 online learning in Michigan and beyond and to make key recommendations for moving the field forward in an informed way. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Implications for research, policy, and practice are shared.
K-12在线学习中的学生问责制:来自密歇根州利益相关者及其他方面的观点。
随着K-12在线学习领域的指数级增长,围绕该领域的政策也在不断演变。在密歇根州,2013年颁布的《州立学校援助法案》(State School Aid Act)第21f条加强了家长和学生申请在线课程的能力:“在一个学区就读6至12年级的任何学生都有资格参加本节规定的在线课程。”21f法案的通过引发了人们对选择环境中的问责制的担忧。这种担忧的例子包括,人们普遍认为在线课程缺乏严谨性和质量,对另一个地区教育学生一两门课程却仍对该学生的成长负责的反感,以及对导师和教师如何评估他们的在线学生的不确定性。因此,密歇根虚拟学习研究所(Michigan Virtual Learning Research Institute)——密歇根虚拟大学(Michigan Virtual University)的研究机构——获得了一项以问责制为中心的立法指令。为了响应这一指令,我们采访了密歇根州的利益相关者以及来自其他课程准入州和国家组织的专家,以更好地了解围绕密歇根州及其他地区K-12在线学习问责制的对话,并提出关键建议,以明智的方式推动该领域向前发展。数据采用专题分析进行分析。对研究、政策和实践的启示是共享的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信