Cost-effectiveness comparison between caudal block and intravenous ketorolac as an early post-operative analgesic in pediatric patients underwent surgery below umbilicus segment
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness comparison between caudal block and intravenous ketorolac as an early post-operative analgesic in pediatric patients underwent surgery below umbilicus segment","authors":"J. Kurniawaty, M. Abubakar, D. Sari","doi":"10.19106/JMEDSCIE004601201403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Post-operative pain treatment in pediatric is frequently inadequate that could lead to psychological, physiological and behavioral changes. Therefore, adequate pediatric pain management is needed. Some analgesics such as ketorolac and regional anesthesia techniques such as caudal block have been applied to relieve pain. Ketorolac and caudal block have its own advantages and disadvantages. The aim of study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of ketorolac and caudal blok as a post-operative analgesic in pediatric. This was double blind randomized controlled clinical trial with parallel design conducted in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital. The subjects were children who underwent surgery below umbilicus segment. Seventy patients were randomly divided into two groups with 35 patients in each group. Group I (Caudal block Group) was given caudal block with bupivacaine 0.12% 1 mL/kg body weight (BW) whereas Group II (Ketorolac Group) was given ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg BW intravenously (IV). The patient’s pain was scored at 0, 15, 30, 45 minute and 1, 2, 3 hours after the conscious patients using modified Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS). Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness the both interventions was also compared. The caudal block was more effective in reducing pain than the ketorolac at minutes 0 (27/8 vs 10/25) and 15 (34/1 vs 18/17) (p<0.05). However, at third hour the ketorolac revealed more effective than the caudal block (29/6 vs 32/3) (p<0.05). The cost of the caudal block was higher than the ketorolac (IDR 95.860 ± 5.745 vs IDR 7.200 ± 14.886) (p <0.05). However, the length of stay after the caudal block was shorter than the ketorolac (40.43 ± 13.899 vs 48.57 ± 14.068) (p <0.05). Morphine was more needed for rescue analgesic in the ketorolac (p < 0.05) in first hour of operation, whereas after three hour operation paracetamol was more needed in caudal block (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the caudal block is not more cost-effective than ketorolac in reducing post-operative pain in pediatric patients underwent surgery below umbilicus segment.","PeriodicalId":173108,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19106/JMEDSCIE004601201403","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Post-operative pain treatment in pediatric is frequently inadequate that could lead to psychological, physiological and behavioral changes. Therefore, adequate pediatric pain management is needed. Some analgesics such as ketorolac and regional anesthesia techniques such as caudal block have been applied to relieve pain. Ketorolac and caudal block have its own advantages and disadvantages. The aim of study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of ketorolac and caudal blok as a post-operative analgesic in pediatric. This was double blind randomized controlled clinical trial with parallel design conducted in Dr. Sardjito General Hospital. The subjects were children who underwent surgery below umbilicus segment. Seventy patients were randomly divided into two groups with 35 patients in each group. Group I (Caudal block Group) was given caudal block with bupivacaine 0.12% 1 mL/kg body weight (BW) whereas Group II (Ketorolac Group) was given ketorolac 0.5 mg/kg BW intravenously (IV). The patient’s pain was scored at 0, 15, 30, 45 minute and 1, 2, 3 hours after the conscious patients using modified Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS). Furthermore, the cost-effectiveness the both interventions was also compared. The caudal block was more effective in reducing pain than the ketorolac at minutes 0 (27/8 vs 10/25) and 15 (34/1 vs 18/17) (p<0.05). However, at third hour the ketorolac revealed more effective than the caudal block (29/6 vs 32/3) (p<0.05). The cost of the caudal block was higher than the ketorolac (IDR 95.860 ± 5.745 vs IDR 7.200 ± 14.886) (p <0.05). However, the length of stay after the caudal block was shorter than the ketorolac (40.43 ± 13.899 vs 48.57 ± 14.068) (p <0.05). Morphine was more needed for rescue analgesic in the ketorolac (p < 0.05) in first hour of operation, whereas after three hour operation paracetamol was more needed in caudal block (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the caudal block is not more cost-effective than ketorolac in reducing post-operative pain in pediatric patients underwent surgery below umbilicus segment.
小儿术后疼痛治疗往往不充分,可能导致心理、生理和行为的改变。因此,适当的儿童疼痛管理是必要的。一些镇痛药如酮罗拉酸和区域麻醉技术如尾侧阻滞已被用于缓解疼痛。酮罗拉酸和尾侧阻滞各有优缺点。本研究的目的是比较酮罗拉酸和尾侧阻滞作为小儿术后镇痛药的成本-效果。本研究是在Dr. Sardjito总医院进行的平行设计双盲随机对照临床试验。研究对象为在脐部以下接受手术的儿童。70例患者随机分为两组,每组35例。ⅰ组(尾侧阻滞组)给予0.12%布比卡因1 mL/kg体重(BW)的尾侧阻滞,ⅱ组(酮劳酸组)给予酮劳酸0.5 mg/kg体重(IV)静脉注射。采用改进的东安大略省儿童医院疼痛量表(mCHEOPS)分别在患者清醒后0、15、30、45分钟和1、2、3小时对患者进行疼痛评分。此外,还比较了两种干预措施的成本-效果。在第0分钟(27/8 vs 10/25)和第15分钟(34/1 vs 18/17),尾侧阻滞比酮乐酸更有效地减轻疼痛(p<0.05)。然而,在第3小时,酮罗拉酸显示比尾侧阻滞更有效(29/6 vs 32/3) (p<0.05)。尾侧阻滞成本高于酮罗拉酸(IDR 95.860±5.745 vs IDR 7.200±14.886)(p <0.05)。但术后停留时间较酮罗拉酸短(40.43±13.899 vs 48.57±14.068)(p <0.05)。术中第1 h时酮洛酸组对吗啡的抢救性镇痛需求较多(p < 0.05),术中3 h后尾侧阻滞组对扑热息痛的抢救性镇痛需求较多(p < 0.05)。综上所述,在减少脐部以下儿童手术患者术后疼痛方面,尾侧阻滞并不比酮罗拉酸更具成本效益。