Five years prospective survey of antibiotic resistance in Bacteroides and Parabacteroides isolated from inpatients of clinical hospital in Warsaw, Poland

{"title":"Five years prospective survey of antibiotic resistance in Bacteroides and Parabacteroides isolated from inpatients of clinical hospital in Warsaw, Poland","authors":"","doi":"10.32394/mdm.72.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Diagnostics of anaerobic bacterial infections and determination of drug susceptibility are technically difficult and time-consuming; therefore, the number of studies on Anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli is significantly limited, especially in Europe.\nThe aim of the study was to analyze the antibiotic susceptibility of clinically important anaerobic bacteria Bacteroides spp. and Parabacteroides distasonis. Strains were isolated from infections of patients hospitalized at one Polish hospital as a result of routine microbiological diagnostics.\nMaterial and methods: Clinical isolates were identified with MALDI-TOF MS.\nAntimicrobial susceptibility of 276 strains was carried out by E-test gradient strip to commonly used antibiotics i.e. benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, imipenem, clindamycin and metronidazole. MIC values were determined. The interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility tests were conducted in accordance with The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations.\nResults: Susceptibility tests of all isolates yielded the following rates of resistance to the evaluated β-lactam antibiotics: benzylpenicillin (96%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (7.6%), imipenem (2.1%). In presented study 38.8% of clindamycin-resistant strains were isolated, among them 18.3% of B. fragilis and 53.85% P. distasonis. All strain were susceptible to metronidazole.\nConclusions: Obtained results and analysis of the results of other researchers convinces us that it is necessary to routinely or at least periodically monitor drug susceptibility of clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria and use targeted therapy based on the result of the antibiogram. Although high percentage of the tested Bacteroides and Parabacteroides strains remained susceptible to metronidazole and β-lactam antibiotics the use of clindamycin in empirical therapy may not be efficacious. Antibiogram results should be consult with the staff responsible for patient treatment and hospital antibiotic policies.","PeriodicalId":18566,"journal":{"name":"Medycyna doświadczalna i mikrobiologia","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medycyna doświadczalna i mikrobiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32394/mdm.72.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Diagnostics of anaerobic bacterial infections and determination of drug susceptibility are technically difficult and time-consuming; therefore, the number of studies on Anaerobic Gram-negative bacilli is significantly limited, especially in Europe. The aim of the study was to analyze the antibiotic susceptibility of clinically important anaerobic bacteria Bacteroides spp. and Parabacteroides distasonis. Strains were isolated from infections of patients hospitalized at one Polish hospital as a result of routine microbiological diagnostics. Material and methods: Clinical isolates were identified with MALDI-TOF MS. Antimicrobial susceptibility of 276 strains was carried out by E-test gradient strip to commonly used antibiotics i.e. benzylpenicillin, amoxicillin with clavulanic acid, imipenem, clindamycin and metronidazole. MIC values were determined. The interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility tests were conducted in accordance with The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) recommendations. Results: Susceptibility tests of all isolates yielded the following rates of resistance to the evaluated β-lactam antibiotics: benzylpenicillin (96%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (7.6%), imipenem (2.1%). In presented study 38.8% of clindamycin-resistant strains were isolated, among them 18.3% of B. fragilis and 53.85% P. distasonis. All strain were susceptible to metronidazole. Conclusions: Obtained results and analysis of the results of other researchers convinces us that it is necessary to routinely or at least periodically monitor drug susceptibility of clinical isolates of anaerobic bacteria and use targeted therapy based on the result of the antibiogram. Although high percentage of the tested Bacteroides and Parabacteroides strains remained susceptible to metronidazole and β-lactam antibiotics the use of clindamycin in empirical therapy may not be efficacious. Antibiogram results should be consult with the staff responsible for patient treatment and hospital antibiotic policies.
波兰华沙市临床医院住院患者分离拟杆菌和副拟杆菌5年抗生素耐药性的前瞻性调查
目的:厌氧菌感染的诊断和药敏检测技术难度大,耗时长;因此,对厌氧革兰氏阴性杆菌的研究数量明显有限,特别是在欧洲。本研究的目的是分析临床重要的厌氧细菌拟杆菌(Bacteroides spp.)和副芽孢杆菌(parabobacterides disasonis)的抗生素敏感性。通过常规微生物诊断,从波兰一家医院住院患者的感染中分离出菌株。材料与方法:采用MALDI-TOF ms对276株临床分离菌株进行鉴定,采用E-test梯度试纸条法对常用抗生素青霉素、阿莫西林加克拉维酸、亚胺培南、克林霉素和甲硝唑进行敏感性检测。测定MIC值。对抗菌药物敏感性试验的解释是根据欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)的建议进行的。结果:所有分离株对β-内酰胺类抗生素的耐药率分别为:青霉素(96%)、阿莫西林/克拉维酸(7.6%)、亚胺培南(2.1%)。本研究共分离出38.8%的克林霉素耐药菌株,其中脆弱双歧杆菌18.3%,霉变单胞杆菌53.85%。所有菌株对甲硝唑均敏感。结论:所得结果及对其他研究者结果的分析,使我们相信有必要对临床分离的厌氧菌进行常规或至少定期的药敏监测,并根据抗生素谱结果进行靶向治疗。虽然测试的大部分拟杆菌和副杆菌菌株仍然对甲硝唑和β-内酰胺类抗生素敏感,但在经验性治疗中使用克林霉素可能效果不佳。抗生素造影结果应咨询负责患者治疗的工作人员和医院的抗生素政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信