{"title":"Comovement in the FTSE 100 Index","authors":"Bryan Mase","doi":"10.1080/17446540701222425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article extends recent research (Barberis et al., 2005) on the impact of index changes on stock comovement. Stocks that are added to the FTSE 100 comove more closely with the FTSE 100, whilst the reverse is found in stocks deleted from the FTSE 100. Consistent with previous research, these changes appear to have become larger over more recent years. As a result of the method by which changes are made to the FTSE 100, this article is able to distinguish between additions that are new firms and additions that have previously been constituents. There is a significant difference between these two sets of firms, both in terms of the change in comovement and the extent of their comovement after addition to the FTSE 100. Specifically, it is the change in comovement among firms that are new to the FTSE 100 that drives much of the overall increase in comovement among additions. This result implies that the change in comovement cannot be explained solely by the behavioural finance view of comovement and the associated impact of category or habitat traders.","PeriodicalId":345744,"journal":{"name":"Applied Financial Economics Letters","volume":"178 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Financial Economics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17446540701222425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18
Abstract
This article extends recent research (Barberis et al., 2005) on the impact of index changes on stock comovement. Stocks that are added to the FTSE 100 comove more closely with the FTSE 100, whilst the reverse is found in stocks deleted from the FTSE 100. Consistent with previous research, these changes appear to have become larger over more recent years. As a result of the method by which changes are made to the FTSE 100, this article is able to distinguish between additions that are new firms and additions that have previously been constituents. There is a significant difference between these two sets of firms, both in terms of the change in comovement and the extent of their comovement after addition to the FTSE 100. Specifically, it is the change in comovement among firms that are new to the FTSE 100 that drives much of the overall increase in comovement among additions. This result implies that the change in comovement cannot be explained solely by the behavioural finance view of comovement and the associated impact of category or habitat traders.
本文扩展了最近关于指数变化对股票变动影响的研究(Barberis et al., 2005)。加入富时100指数的股票与富时100指数走势更接近,而从富时100指数中删除的股票则相反。与之前的研究一致,这些变化似乎在最近几年变得更大。由于对富时100指数进行更改的方法,本文能够区分新加入的公司和以前已成为成分股的公司。这两组公司之间存在显著差异,无论是在变动的变化方面,还是在加入富时100指数后的变动程度方面。具体来说,是富时100指数(FTSE 100)新成分股公司之间变动的变化,在很大程度上推动了新成分股公司之间变动的总体增长。这一结果意味着,共同运动的变化不能仅仅用共同运动的行为金融学观点和类别或栖息地交易者的相关影响来解释。