“No Such Faery Land, So Like the Real World”: Miles Coverdale’s Performance of the Utopian Spectacle

Ashley Rattner
{"title":"“No Such Faery Land, So Like the Real World”: Miles Coverdale’s Performance of the Utopian Spectacle","authors":"Ashley Rattner","doi":"10.5325/nathhawtrevi.47.2.0231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Ticknor and Fields advertised The Blithedale Romance as a glimpse into Hawthorne’s six-month participation in George Ripley’s Brook Farm experiment. While Brook Farm had been largely forgotten by 1852, the novel’s appeal lay in its connection to its author, a sudden celebrity in the wake of The Scarlet Letter’s commercial success in 1850. As his novels attracted a growing fanbase, readers sought out Blithedale for the purpose of learning about Hawthorne’s past. Ticknor and Fields’s marketing efforts had expanded their print sphere beyond the immediate locality to address a national audience, thrusting fame and recognition on authors to a degree that could not have been previously imagined. Vexed that American readers had not critically examined the ramifications of this expanding print sphere, Hawthorne composes Blithedale to correct the equation of a fictional narrator with a novel’s author, a product of the evolving culture of literary celebrity. Insisting his text be classified as a romance, Hawthorne subverts any recognizable feature of the genre to elicit feelings of disorientation, frustration, and disappointment in readers expecting to access the author’s biographical feelings and impressions of the defunct transcendentalist commune. By situating his romance within a chapter from his own life and then failing to provide any insight as to his biographical experience, Hawthorne invites the reader to consider the changing dynamics of the relationship between author and audience.","PeriodicalId":261601,"journal":{"name":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nathaniel Hawthorne Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/nathhawtrevi.47.2.0231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ticknor and Fields advertised The Blithedale Romance as a glimpse into Hawthorne’s six-month participation in George Ripley’s Brook Farm experiment. While Brook Farm had been largely forgotten by 1852, the novel’s appeal lay in its connection to its author, a sudden celebrity in the wake of The Scarlet Letter’s commercial success in 1850. As his novels attracted a growing fanbase, readers sought out Blithedale for the purpose of learning about Hawthorne’s past. Ticknor and Fields’s marketing efforts had expanded their print sphere beyond the immediate locality to address a national audience, thrusting fame and recognition on authors to a degree that could not have been previously imagined. Vexed that American readers had not critically examined the ramifications of this expanding print sphere, Hawthorne composes Blithedale to correct the equation of a fictional narrator with a novel’s author, a product of the evolving culture of literary celebrity. Insisting his text be classified as a romance, Hawthorne subverts any recognizable feature of the genre to elicit feelings of disorientation, frustration, and disappointment in readers expecting to access the author’s biographical feelings and impressions of the defunct transcendentalist commune. By situating his romance within a chapter from his own life and then failing to provide any insight as to his biographical experience, Hawthorne invites the reader to consider the changing dynamics of the relationship between author and audience.
“没有这样的仙境,如此像真实的世界”:迈尔斯·科弗代尔对乌托邦奇观的表演
《提克诺与菲尔兹》在广告中称,这部小说是对霍桑参加乔治·里普利的布鲁克农场实验的六个月的一瞥。到1852年,《布鲁克农场》基本上已被人遗忘,但这部小说的吸引力在于它与作者之间的联系。1850年,《红字》在商业上取得成功后,作者突然成名。随着他的小说吸引了越来越多的粉丝,读者们为了了解霍桑的过去而找到了布利斯代尔。蒂克诺和菲尔兹的营销努力已经将他们的印刷领域从当地扩展到面向全国的读者,使作者的名声和认可达到了以前无法想象的程度。霍桑对美国读者没有批判性地审视这个不断扩大的印刷领域的后果感到烦恼,他创作了《Blithedale》,以纠正虚构的叙述者与小说作者之间的等式,这是文学名人文化不断发展的产物。霍桑坚持把他的作品归类为浪漫小说,他颠覆了这种类型的任何可识别的特征,以引起读者的迷失、沮丧和失望的感觉,这些读者希望了解作者对已不复存在的先验主义公社的传记感受和印象。霍桑将他的浪漫故事置于他自己生活的一章中,而没有提供任何关于他的传记经历的洞察力,这让读者思考作者和观众之间不断变化的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信