Investment Shocks and Asset Returns: International Evidence

Ruchith Dissanayake, Akiko Watanabe, M. Watanabe
{"title":"Investment Shocks and Asset Returns: International Evidence","authors":"Ruchith Dissanayake, Akiko Watanabe, M. Watanabe","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2845648","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study how investment-specific technology shocks are priced in a large cross section of stocks from 33 countries. The investment premium is generally negative and often significant in developed countries with greater access to capital, better financial institutions, and higher product market competition, while it is largely insignificant or sometimes even significantly positive in emerging markets with opposite characteristics. The investment premium is related to, but not subsumed in, the value premium. Our results underscore the importance of economic development and allocative efficiency in the pricing of technological advances, and help reconcile the conflicting existing evidence from the U.S. market with different sample periods.","PeriodicalId":129035,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Asset Pricing","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Asset Pricing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2845648","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We study how investment-specific technology shocks are priced in a large cross section of stocks from 33 countries. The investment premium is generally negative and often significant in developed countries with greater access to capital, better financial institutions, and higher product market competition, while it is largely insignificant or sometimes even significantly positive in emerging markets with opposite characteristics. The investment premium is related to, but not subsumed in, the value premium. Our results underscore the importance of economic development and allocative efficiency in the pricing of technological advances, and help reconcile the conflicting existing evidence from the U.S. market with different sample periods.
投资冲击与资产回报:国际证据
我们研究了来自33个国家的大量股票的投资特定技术冲击是如何定价的。投资溢价一般为负,在资本获取渠道更广、金融机构更好、产品市场竞争更激烈的发达国家往往显著,而在具有相反特征的新兴市场,投资溢价基本上不显著,有时甚至显著为正。投资溢价与价值溢价相关,但不包含在价值溢价中。我们的研究结果强调了经济发展和配置效率在技术进步定价中的重要性,并有助于调和来自不同样本时期的美国市场的相互矛盾的现有证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信