MODERN, POSTMODERN, AND FOREIGN CULTURAL POLICY

Bohdan Bilobrovets
{"title":"MODERN, POSTMODERN, AND FOREIGN CULTURAL POLICY","authors":"Bohdan Bilobrovets","doi":"10.46340/ephd.2022.8.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article investigates the discourse of modernity and postmodernity, modernism and postmodernism in the context of historical changes, processes of globalization, and the development of foreign cultural policy. The issue of postmodernity is extremely complex and confusing both in the case of definitions and in its relation to modernity. Today such concepts as post-postmodernism, antimodernism, and metamodernism not only underline the overwhelming critique of postmodernity, but also the need to comprehend the current time. In the article, the author shows the genesis of the philosophical views on modernity as well as different approaches to postmodernity. The postmodern era was built during the period of restructuring of international politics, the crisis in all spheres of social and cultural life, as well as with the heavy burden of the horrors of World War II. The battle of ideologies and the Cold War intensified the technological development and restructuring of the world economy. Philosophically, criticism of the modern system of social relations and metanarratives of Modernism has become attractive to many academics. Globalization has changed the attitude to time and space, while in the international political field, new strong connections were created between states and the formation of international organizations. Deconstructivism and poststructuralism became the core of the postmodernist approach. The deconstruction of essentialist concepts, skepticism about previous paradigmatic attitudes, the destruction of the illusions of previous generations, and the rethinking of values became the basis of the Postmodern period. Globalization has reduced the influence of nation-states. Despite this, new mechanisms of influence are gradually being developed, which can be traced to the development of foreign cultural policy. Modern states today partly use corporate mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":115449,"journal":{"name":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European philosophical and historical discourse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46340/ephd.2022.8.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article investigates the discourse of modernity and postmodernity, modernism and postmodernism in the context of historical changes, processes of globalization, and the development of foreign cultural policy. The issue of postmodernity is extremely complex and confusing both in the case of definitions and in its relation to modernity. Today such concepts as post-postmodernism, antimodernism, and metamodernism not only underline the overwhelming critique of postmodernity, but also the need to comprehend the current time. In the article, the author shows the genesis of the philosophical views on modernity as well as different approaches to postmodernity. The postmodern era was built during the period of restructuring of international politics, the crisis in all spheres of social and cultural life, as well as with the heavy burden of the horrors of World War II. The battle of ideologies and the Cold War intensified the technological development and restructuring of the world economy. Philosophically, criticism of the modern system of social relations and metanarratives of Modernism has become attractive to many academics. Globalization has changed the attitude to time and space, while in the international political field, new strong connections were created between states and the formation of international organizations. Deconstructivism and poststructuralism became the core of the postmodernist approach. The deconstruction of essentialist concepts, skepticism about previous paradigmatic attitudes, the destruction of the illusions of previous generations, and the rethinking of values became the basis of the Postmodern period. Globalization has reduced the influence of nation-states. Despite this, new mechanisms of influence are gradually being developed, which can be traced to the development of foreign cultural policy. Modern states today partly use corporate mechanisms.
现代、后现代和对外文化政策
本文在历史变迁、全球化进程和对外文化政策发展的背景下,探讨了现代性与后现代主义、现代主义与后现代主义的话语。在后现代性的定义及其与现代性的关系上,都是一个极其复杂和混乱的问题。今天,诸如后后现代主义、反现代主义和元现代主义等概念不仅强调了对后现代性的压倒性批判,而且还强调了理解当前时代的必要性。在这篇文章中,作者展示了现代性哲学观点的起源,以及不同的后现代性研究方法。后现代时代是在国际政治结构调整、社会和文化生活各个领域的危机以及第二次世界大战恐怖的沉重负担期间建立起来的。意识形态的斗争和冷战加剧了技术的发展和世界经济的重组。在哲学上,对现代社会关系体系和现代主义元叙事的批判吸引了许多学者。全球化改变了人们对时间和空间的态度,在国际政治领域,国与国之间建立了新的紧密联系,形成了国际组织。解构主义和后结构主义成为后现代主义的核心。对本质主义概念的解构,对以往范式态度的质疑,对前人幻想的破坏,对价值的重新思考,成为后现代时期的基础。全球化削弱了民族国家的影响力。尽管如此,新的影响机制正在逐渐形成,这可以追溯到外交文化政策的发展。今天的现代国家在一定程度上采用了公司机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信