Uncooperative congestion control

K. Chandrayana, S. Kalyanaraman
{"title":"Uncooperative congestion control","authors":"K. Chandrayana, S. Kalyanaraman","doi":"10.1145/1005686.1005718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Traditionally uncooperative rate control schemes have implied open loop protocols such as UDP, CBR, etc. In this paper we show that closed loop uncooperative rate control schemes also exist and that the current AQM proposals cannot efficiently control their mis-behavior. Moreover, these proposals require that AQM be installed at all routers in the Internet which is not only expensive but requires significant network upgrade.In this paper we show that management of uncooperative flows need not be coupled with AQM design but can be viewed as edge based policing question. In this paper we propose an analytical model for managing uncooperative flows in the Internet by re-mapping their utility function to a target range of utility functions. This mapping can be achieved by transparently manipulating congestion penalties conveyed to the uncooperative users.The most interesting aspect of this research is that this task can be performed at the edge of the network with little state information about uncooperative flows. The proposed solution is independent of the buffer management algorithm deployed on the network. As such it works with Drop-Tail queues as well as any AQM scheme. We have analyzed the framework and evaluated it on various single and multi-bottleneck topologies with both Drop-Tail and RED. Our results show that the framework is robust and works well even in presence of background traffic and reverse path congestion.","PeriodicalId":172626,"journal":{"name":"SIGMETRICS '04/Performance '04","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGMETRICS '04/Performance '04","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1005686.1005718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Traditionally uncooperative rate control schemes have implied open loop protocols such as UDP, CBR, etc. In this paper we show that closed loop uncooperative rate control schemes also exist and that the current AQM proposals cannot efficiently control their mis-behavior. Moreover, these proposals require that AQM be installed at all routers in the Internet which is not only expensive but requires significant network upgrade.In this paper we show that management of uncooperative flows need not be coupled with AQM design but can be viewed as edge based policing question. In this paper we propose an analytical model for managing uncooperative flows in the Internet by re-mapping their utility function to a target range of utility functions. This mapping can be achieved by transparently manipulating congestion penalties conveyed to the uncooperative users.The most interesting aspect of this research is that this task can be performed at the edge of the network with little state information about uncooperative flows. The proposed solution is independent of the buffer management algorithm deployed on the network. As such it works with Drop-Tail queues as well as any AQM scheme. We have analyzed the framework and evaluated it on various single and multi-bottleneck topologies with both Drop-Tail and RED. Our results show that the framework is robust and works well even in presence of background traffic and reverse path congestion.
非合作拥塞控制
传统的非合作速率控制方案隐含着开环协议,如UDP、CBR等。本文证明了闭环非合作速率控制方案也存在,并且目前的AQM方案不能有效地控制它们的错误行为。此外,这些建议要求在互联网上的所有路由器上安装AQM,这不仅价格昂贵,而且需要进行大量的网络升级。在本文中,我们证明了非合作流的管理不需要与AQM设计相结合,而可以被视为基于边缘的监管问题。在本文中,我们提出了一个分析模型,通过将非合作流的效用函数重新映射到效用函数的目标范围来管理互联网中的非合作流。这种映射可以通过透明地操纵传递给不合作用户的拥塞惩罚来实现。本研究最有趣的方面是,该任务可以在网络边缘执行,几乎没有关于非合作流的状态信息。该方案不依赖于网络上部署的缓冲区管理算法。因此,它可以与Drop-Tail队列以及任何AQM方案一起工作。我们分析了该框架,并使用Drop-Tail和RED在各种单瓶颈和多瓶颈拓扑上对其进行了评估。结果表明,该框架具有鲁棒性,即使在存在背景交通和反向路径拥塞的情况下也能很好地工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信