A study on the probabilistic safety assessment of the truss structure designed by the LRFD code

N. Doan
{"title":"A study on the probabilistic safety assessment of the truss structure designed by the LRFD code","authors":"N. Doan","doi":"10.31814/stce.nuce2023-17(1)-09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The probabilistic analyses provide a more rational approach for the safety assessment of structures since they consider the uncertainties in the calculations. Consequently, the design specifications of engineering structures are gradually transformed from the allowable stress design to the reliability-based specifications such as load and resistance factors design (LRFD) or partial safety factor design. The partial safety factors and the load andresistance factors provided in the reliability-based design codes are successfully determined from probabilistic frameworks. However, these specifications are classified into semi-probabilistic-based codes because no probabilistic analysis is required in the design practice. Thus, the actual reliability index of the design solutions maynot be as close to the target value as expected. This study employs the fully probabilistic analysis as an additional analysis to examine the reliability index of an LRFD-based design of the truss structure. A planar truss,which is designed following the semi-probabilistic code, is thoroughly examined. Several feasible sections are first designed using the LRFD code. Then, the actual reliability indexes of truss structures are evaluated to check if they meet the target reliability index specified in the reliability-based design codes. The tension and compression members concerning the strength limit state and the maximum deflection presenting for service ability are investigated as representative performances. The results of the probabilistic analyses indicate thatthe reliability indexes for the strength limit state are higher than the target value stipulated in the LRFD code. Compared to the tension members, more redundancy in terms of reliability index is observed for compression elements, although they are both designed at the limit state. Moreover, the reliability index obtained for theserviceability limit state is strongly dependent on the component (i.e., floor or roof) where the truss is utilized.","PeriodicalId":387908,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (STCE) - HUCE","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering (STCE) - HUCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31814/stce.nuce2023-17(1)-09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The probabilistic analyses provide a more rational approach for the safety assessment of structures since they consider the uncertainties in the calculations. Consequently, the design specifications of engineering structures are gradually transformed from the allowable stress design to the reliability-based specifications such as load and resistance factors design (LRFD) or partial safety factor design. The partial safety factors and the load andresistance factors provided in the reliability-based design codes are successfully determined from probabilistic frameworks. However, these specifications are classified into semi-probabilistic-based codes because no probabilistic analysis is required in the design practice. Thus, the actual reliability index of the design solutions maynot be as close to the target value as expected. This study employs the fully probabilistic analysis as an additional analysis to examine the reliability index of an LRFD-based design of the truss structure. A planar truss,which is designed following the semi-probabilistic code, is thoroughly examined. Several feasible sections are first designed using the LRFD code. Then, the actual reliability indexes of truss structures are evaluated to check if they meet the target reliability index specified in the reliability-based design codes. The tension and compression members concerning the strength limit state and the maximum deflection presenting for service ability are investigated as representative performances. The results of the probabilistic analyses indicate thatthe reliability indexes for the strength limit state are higher than the target value stipulated in the LRFD code. Compared to the tension members, more redundancy in terms of reliability index is observed for compression elements, although they are both designed at the limit state. Moreover, the reliability index obtained for theserviceability limit state is strongly dependent on the component (i.e., floor or roof) where the truss is utilized.
基于LRFD规范设计的桁架结构概率安全评估研究
概率分析考虑了计算中的不确定性,为结构的安全评估提供了一种更为合理的方法。因此,工程结构的设计规范逐渐从允许应力设计转变为基于可靠性的规范,如荷载和阻力系数设计(LRFD)或部分安全系数设计。在概率框架下,成功地确定了基于可靠性的设计规范中的部分安全系数和荷载与阻力系数。然而,这些规范被归类为半基于概率的代码,因为在设计实践中不需要进行概率分析。因此,设计方案的实际可靠度指标可能不像预期的那样接近目标值。本文采用全概率分析作为附加分析,考察了基于lrfd的桁架结构设计的可靠度指标。对按半概率规范设计的平面桁架进行了全面的分析。首先用LRFD规范设计了几个可行的断面。然后,对桁架结构的实际可靠度指标进行评估,检查其是否满足基于可靠度设计规范规定的目标可靠度指标。研究了具有代表性的拉、压构件强度极限状态和最大挠度表现为使用能力的性能。概率分析结果表明,强度极限状态的可靠度指标高于LRFD规范规定的目标值。与受拉构件相比,压缩构件在可靠性指标上有更多的冗余,尽管它们都是在极限状态下设计的。此外,在使用极限状态下获得的可靠性指标强烈依赖于使用桁架的构件(即楼板或屋顶)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信