Social and Cultural Contributions to Health, Differences, and Inequalities

S. Estroff, G. Henderson
{"title":"Social and Cultural Contributions to Health, Differences, and Inequalities","authors":"S. Estroff, G. Henderson","doi":"10.1515/9781478004363-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disease and health, birth and death, bodily suffering and debilitation are not the presumptive territory of laboratory scientists and clinicians in white coats. Scholars from the social sciences and humanities in the fields of social medicine, health humanities, sociomedical and health systems sciences, and structural competence deploy interdisciplinary tools to understand the experiences and meaning of illness, medical training and practice, and the historical, po liti cal, and structural, as well as biocultural influences on health status and disease. Here we introduce under lying concepts and perspectives foundational to social and cultural approaches to health and illness. The topics at issue are sometimes referred to as social determinants of health. We take the view that identifying and accounting for the complex synergies of the social and biological is an ongoing enterprise— promising and persuasive, but as yet an incomplete demonstration of causal, determinative certainty. The terrain includes work in medical sociology and anthropology, public health, social epidemiology, and intersectional studies of health disparity and in equality, disability, science and technology, sexualities, narrative in medicine, gender identity and expression, race and ethnicity, and disability. These approaches have in common conceptual frameworks that include the following:","PeriodicalId":199759,"journal":{"name":"The Social Medicine Reader, Volume II, Third Edition","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Social Medicine Reader, Volume II, Third Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478004363-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disease and health, birth and death, bodily suffering and debilitation are not the presumptive territory of laboratory scientists and clinicians in white coats. Scholars from the social sciences and humanities in the fields of social medicine, health humanities, sociomedical and health systems sciences, and structural competence deploy interdisciplinary tools to understand the experiences and meaning of illness, medical training and practice, and the historical, po liti cal, and structural, as well as biocultural influences on health status and disease. Here we introduce under lying concepts and perspectives foundational to social and cultural approaches to health and illness. The topics at issue are sometimes referred to as social determinants of health. We take the view that identifying and accounting for the complex synergies of the social and biological is an ongoing enterprise— promising and persuasive, but as yet an incomplete demonstration of causal, determinative certainty. The terrain includes work in medical sociology and anthropology, public health, social epidemiology, and intersectional studies of health disparity and in equality, disability, science and technology, sexualities, narrative in medicine, gender identity and expression, race and ethnicity, and disability. These approaches have in common conceptual frameworks that include the following:
社会和文化对健康、差异和不平等的贡献
疾病与健康、出生与死亡、身体的痛苦与衰弱,都不是实验室科学家和穿着白大褂的临床医生的假定范畴。社会医学、健康人文科学、社会医学和卫生系统科学以及结构能力等领域的社会科学和人文学科学者利用跨学科工具来理解疾病、医疗培训和实践的经验和意义,以及历史、政治、结构和生物文化对健康状况和疾病的影响。在这里,我们介绍了基础的概念和观点,以社会和文化的方法,以健康和疾病。这些问题有时被称为健康的社会决定因素。我们认为,识别和解释社会和生物的复杂协同作用是一项正在进行的事业-有希望和有说服力,但尚未完全证明因果关系,决定性的确定性。研究领域包括医学社会学和人类学、公共卫生、社会流行病学,以及健康差距和平等、残疾、科学和技术、性行为、医学叙事、性别认同和表达、种族和民族以及残疾等方面的交叉研究。这些方法具有共同的概念框架,其中包括:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信