Gödel-McKinsey-Tarski and Blok-Esakia for Heyting-Lewis Implication

Jim de Groot, Tadeusz Litak, D. Pattinson
{"title":"Gödel-McKinsey-Tarski and Blok-Esakia for Heyting-Lewis Implication","authors":"Jim de Groot, Tadeusz Litak, D. Pattinson","doi":"10.1109/LICS52264.2021.9470508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Heyting-Lewis Logic is the extension of intuitionistic propositional logic with a strict implication connective that satisfies the constructive counterparts of axioms for strict implication provable in classical modal logics. Variants of this logic are surprisingly widespread: they appear as Curry-Howard correspondents of (simple type theory extended with) Haskell-style arrows, in preservativity logic of Heyting arithmetic, in the proof theory of guarded (co)recursion, and in the generalization of intuitionistic epistemic logic.Heyting-Lewis Logic can be interpreted in intuitionistic Kripke frames extended with a binary relation to account for strict implication. We use this semantics to define descriptive frames (generalisations of Esakia spaces), and establish a categorical duality between the algebraic interpretation and the frame semantics. We then adapt a transformation by Wolter and Zakharyaschev to translate Heyting-Lewis Logic to classical modal logic with two unary operators. This allows us to prove a Blok-Esakia theorem that we then use to obtain both known and new canonicity and correspondence theorems, and the finite model property and decidability for a large family of Heyting-Lewis logics.","PeriodicalId":174663,"journal":{"name":"2021 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 36th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS52264.2021.9470508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Heyting-Lewis Logic is the extension of intuitionistic propositional logic with a strict implication connective that satisfies the constructive counterparts of axioms for strict implication provable in classical modal logics. Variants of this logic are surprisingly widespread: they appear as Curry-Howard correspondents of (simple type theory extended with) Haskell-style arrows, in preservativity logic of Heyting arithmetic, in the proof theory of guarded (co)recursion, and in the generalization of intuitionistic epistemic logic.Heyting-Lewis Logic can be interpreted in intuitionistic Kripke frames extended with a binary relation to account for strict implication. We use this semantics to define descriptive frames (generalisations of Esakia spaces), and establish a categorical duality between the algebraic interpretation and the frame semantics. We then adapt a transformation by Wolter and Zakharyaschev to translate Heyting-Lewis Logic to classical modal logic with two unary operators. This allows us to prove a Blok-Esakia theorem that we then use to obtain both known and new canonicity and correspondence theorems, and the finite model property and decidability for a large family of Heyting-Lewis logics.
Heyting-Lewis逻辑是具有严格蕴涵连接的直觉命题逻辑的扩展,它满足经典模态逻辑中严格蕴涵可证明公理的构式对应物。这种逻辑的变体惊人地广泛:它们出现在(用haskell风格的箭头扩展的简单类型论)的Curry-Howard通信中,在Heyting算法的保存性逻辑中,在守卫(co)递归的证明论中,以及在直觉主义认知逻辑的推广中。Heyting-Lewis逻辑可以用带有二元关系的直觉主义Kripke框架来解释,以解释严格蕴涵。我们用这个语义定义了描述框架(Esakia空间的概化),并在代数解释和框架语义之间建立了范畴对偶性。然后,我们采用Wolter和Zakharyaschev的变换将heyding - lewis逻辑转换为具有两个一元算子的经典模态逻辑。这允许我们证明一个block - esakia定理,然后我们用它来获得已知的和新的正则性和对应定理,以及一个大族Heyting-Lewis逻辑的有限模型性质和可判定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信