The Validation of a Quantitative Measure of Self-authorship among Chinese University Students

Dorothy Tao Li
{"title":"The Validation of a Quantitative Measure of Self-authorship among Chinese University Students","authors":"Dorothy Tao Li","doi":"10.4995/head20.2020.11171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the preliminary evidence for validating the Self-authorship Section of the Career Decision Making Survey (SA-CDMS; Creamer, Baxter Magolda, & Yue, 2010) among Chinese university students. Two samples of undergraduate students (Stage One, N= 263; Stage Two, N= 663) from three universities in the People’s Republic of China participated in this study. In the first stage, the SA-CDMS was translated from English to Chinese, with the psychometric properties preliminarily examined by exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency test. The original 18-item SA-CDMS model failed to identify the theoretical structures as expected, however, several modifications could be identified from the results of Stage One. In the second stage, the modified SA-CDMS showed acceptable reliability and validity based on the results of confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. In addition, Pearson’s correlation analysis was employed by Stage Two to examine the correlations among the demographic factors, three phases, and three dimensions of self-authorship framework. In general, the current study provided evidence for utilizing SA-CDMS in the Chinese higher education context. This study added to the literature of the research on self-authorship and offered practical implications to educators and policymakers in promoting self-authorship development among Chinese university students.","PeriodicalId":351217,"journal":{"name":"6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'20)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"6th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'20)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/head20.2020.11171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the preliminary evidence for validating the Self-authorship Section of the Career Decision Making Survey (SA-CDMS; Creamer, Baxter Magolda, & Yue, 2010) among Chinese university students. Two samples of undergraduate students (Stage One, N= 263; Stage Two, N= 663) from three universities in the People’s Republic of China participated in this study. In the first stage, the SA-CDMS was translated from English to Chinese, with the psychometric properties preliminarily examined by exploratory factor analysis and internal consistency test. The original 18-item SA-CDMS model failed to identify the theoretical structures as expected, however, several modifications could be identified from the results of Stage One. In the second stage, the modified SA-CDMS showed acceptable reliability and validity based on the results of confirmatory factor analysis and Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. In addition, Pearson’s correlation analysis was employed by Stage Two to examine the correlations among the demographic factors, three phases, and three dimensions of self-authorship framework. In general, the current study provided evidence for utilizing SA-CDMS in the Chinese higher education context. This study added to the literature of the research on self-authorship and offered practical implications to educators and policymakers in promoting self-authorship development among Chinese university students.
中国大学生自我创作能力定量测量的验证
本文提出了职业决策调查(SA-CDMS)中自我作者部分的初步验证证据;Creamer, Baxter Magolda, & Yue, 2010)。两个本科生样本(第一阶段,N= 263;第二阶段,来自中华人民共和国三所大学的N= 663人参与了本研究。第一阶段,将SA-CDMS进行中英文翻译,并通过探索性因子分析和内部一致性检验对其心理测量特性进行初步检验。最初的18项SA-CDMS模型未能识别出预期的理论结构,然而,从第一阶段的结果中可以识别出一些修改。第二阶段,经验证性因子分析和Cronbach’s alpha系数验证,改进后的SA-CDMS具有可接受的信度和效度。第二阶段采用Pearson相关分析,考察人口因素、自我创作框架的三个阶段和三个维度之间的相关性。总的来说,本研究为在中国高等教育背景下使用SA-CDMS提供了证据。本研究补充了关于大学生自我创作能力的研究文献,对教育工作者和政策制定者促进中国大学生自我创作能力的发展具有现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信