{"title":"Darwin goes to Sarajevo: Evolutionary Theories Underlying a Century of Historiography on the Outbreak of the First World War","authors":"Juan L. Fernández","doi":"10.13154/MTS.58.2017.81-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historiography on the outbreak of the First World War is a useful touchstone for understanding in practice the conceptual architecture of historical storytelling. Along with overarching narrative concepts such as Fritz Fischer’s German Bid for World Power ( Griff nach der Weltmacht ), historians could, and often did, employ implicit or explicit theoretical frameworks created in other disciplines such as economics or political science. Since Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species , natural evolution was also one of the most widespread inspiring models. A century of study on the causes of the Great War shows three major narrative patterns with underlying evolutionary assumptions: (i) the struggle for existence; (ii) the self-destroying system; and (iii) the chain of mistakes. They correspond in part to the temporal development of interpretations: from early narratives focused on who-questions, responsibilities, and personified nations (G-stories, for ‘gigantomachy’); through syntheses aiming at why-questions, causes, and societies (D-stories, for ‘doom’); up to current analyses of how-questions, origins, and elite decision-making (M-stories, for ‘mistakes’). From G-stories to M-stories, Clio has been moving away from Darwin, thus reducing her explanatory capabilities. The paradox of a huge scientific effort ending in an unconquerable riddle could be overcome by linking D-stories to a nascent evolutionary social science.","PeriodicalId":218833,"journal":{"name":"Moving the Social","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Moving the Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13154/MTS.58.2017.81-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Historiography on the outbreak of the First World War is a useful touchstone for understanding in practice the conceptual architecture of historical storytelling. Along with overarching narrative concepts such as Fritz Fischer’s German Bid for World Power ( Griff nach der Weltmacht ), historians could, and often did, employ implicit or explicit theoretical frameworks created in other disciplines such as economics or political science. Since Charles Darwin published On the Origin of Species , natural evolution was also one of the most widespread inspiring models. A century of study on the causes of the Great War shows three major narrative patterns with underlying evolutionary assumptions: (i) the struggle for existence; (ii) the self-destroying system; and (iii) the chain of mistakes. They correspond in part to the temporal development of interpretations: from early narratives focused on who-questions, responsibilities, and personified nations (G-stories, for ‘gigantomachy’); through syntheses aiming at why-questions, causes, and societies (D-stories, for ‘doom’); up to current analyses of how-questions, origins, and elite decision-making (M-stories, for ‘mistakes’). From G-stories to M-stories, Clio has been moving away from Darwin, thus reducing her explanatory capabilities. The paradox of a huge scientific effort ending in an unconquerable riddle could be overcome by linking D-stories to a nascent evolutionary social science.
第一次世界大战爆发的史学研究是在实践中理解历史叙事概念架构的有用试金石。除了弗里茨·菲舍尔(Fritz Fischer)的《德国争取世界权力》(Griff nach der Weltmacht)等概括性的叙事概念外,历史学家可以,而且经常使用在经济学或政治学等其他学科中创建的隐含或明确的理论框架。自从查尔斯·达尔文发表《物种起源》以来,自然进化也是最广泛的鼓舞人心的模型之一。对第一次世界大战起因的一个世纪的研究显示了三种主要的叙事模式和潜在的进化假设:(1)生存斗争;(二)自毁系统;(三)错误链。它们在一定程度上与解释的时间发展相对应:从早期的叙述集中在谁的问题、责任和拟人化的国家(g故事,代表“巨人”);通过针对“为什么”问题、原因和社会的综合(d - story,代表“厄运”);直到目前对问题、起源和精英决策(M-stories,即“错误”)的分析。从g故事到m故事,Clio一直在远离达尔文,从而降低了她的解释能力。将d故事与新兴的进化社会科学联系起来,可以克服巨大的科学努力以一个不可征服的谜告终的悖论。