ISBSG variables most frequently used for software effort estimation: a mapping review

Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, M. Fernández-Diego
{"title":"ISBSG variables most frequently used for software effort estimation: a mapping review","authors":"Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara, M. Fernández-Diego","doi":"10.1145/2652524.2652550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The International Software Benchmarking Standards Group (ISBSG) dataset makes it possible to estimate a project's size, effort, duration, and cost.\n Aim: The aim was to analyze the ISBSG variables that have been used by researchers for software effort estimation from 2000, when the first papers were published, until the end of 2013.\n Method: A systematic mapping review was applied to over 167 papers obtained after the filtering process. From these, it was found that 133 papers produce effort estimation and only 107 list the independent variables used in the effort estimation models.\n Results: Seventy-one out of 118 ISBSG variables have been used at least once. There is a group of 20 variables that appear in more than 50% of the papers and include Functional Size (62%), Development Type (58%), Language Type (53%), and Development Platform (52%) following ISBSG recommendations. Sizing and Size attributes altogether represent the most relevant group along with Project attributes that includes 24 technical features of the project and the development platform. All in all, variables that have more missing values are used less frequently.\n Conclusions: This work presents a snapshot of the existing usage of ISBSG variables in software development estimation. Moreover, some insights are provided to guide future studies.","PeriodicalId":124452,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2652524.2652550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: The International Software Benchmarking Standards Group (ISBSG) dataset makes it possible to estimate a project's size, effort, duration, and cost. Aim: The aim was to analyze the ISBSG variables that have been used by researchers for software effort estimation from 2000, when the first papers were published, until the end of 2013. Method: A systematic mapping review was applied to over 167 papers obtained after the filtering process. From these, it was found that 133 papers produce effort estimation and only 107 list the independent variables used in the effort estimation models. Results: Seventy-one out of 118 ISBSG variables have been used at least once. There is a group of 20 variables that appear in more than 50% of the papers and include Functional Size (62%), Development Type (58%), Language Type (53%), and Development Platform (52%) following ISBSG recommendations. Sizing and Size attributes altogether represent the most relevant group along with Project attributes that includes 24 technical features of the project and the development platform. All in all, variables that have more missing values are used less frequently. Conclusions: This work presents a snapshot of the existing usage of ISBSG variables in software development estimation. Moreover, some insights are provided to guide future studies.
最常用于软件工作量评估的ISBSG变量:映射审查
背景:国际软件基准标准组织(ISBSG)数据集使评估项目的规模、工作量、持续时间和成本成为可能。目的:目的是分析从2000年第一批论文发表到2013年底,研究人员用于软件工作量估算的ISBSG变量。方法:对经筛选后获得的167篇论文进行系统的图谱分析。从中发现,133篇论文提出了工作量估计,只有107篇论文列出了工作量估计模型中使用的自变量。结果:118个ISBSG变量中有71个至少使用了一次。超过50%的论文中出现了20个变量,包括ISBSG建议的功能大小(62%)、开发类型(58%)、语言类型(53%)和开发平台(52%)。Sizing和Size属性一起代表了最相关的组,以及包括项目和开发平台的24个技术特性的Project属性。总而言之,丢失值较多的变量使用频率较低。结论:这项工作提供了ISBSG变量在软件开发评估中现有使用情况的快照。同时也为今后的研究提供了一些指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信