Feeling as Creation: Affect and Tertiary Qualities

Russell J. Duvernoy
{"title":"Feeling as Creation: Affect and Tertiary Qualities","authors":"Russell J. Duvernoy","doi":"10.3366/edinburgh/9781474466912.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The chapter focuses on the early modern distinction between primary, secondary, and tertiary qualities. The chapter first discusses Quentin Meillassoux’s efforts to rehabilitate the primary-secondary distinction in his critique of “correlationism”. Despite Meillassoux’s claim that correlationism applies to all modern philosophy since Kant, the chapter argues that Whitehead’s reworking of the primary-secondary-tertiary distinction, based in his unusual reading of Locke, avoids the correlationist charge while opening a different kind of realism. This reworking amounts to an ontological inversion of the three qualities, such that tertiary quality becomes ontologically primary. A key consequence is that “feeling,” for Whitehead, names a metaphysical process constitutive of the real. This is neither a humanist nor psychological claim, but rather a metaphysical one. The chapter closes by situating Deleuze and Guattari’s use of affect along similar lines. However, where Whitehead is largely content with a technical metaphysical result, Deleuze and Guattari explore ensuing existential possibilities in their concept of “becoming-imperceptible”.","PeriodicalId":137199,"journal":{"name":"Affect and Attention After Deleuze and Whitehead","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Affect and Attention After Deleuze and Whitehead","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474466912.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The chapter focuses on the early modern distinction between primary, secondary, and tertiary qualities. The chapter first discusses Quentin Meillassoux’s efforts to rehabilitate the primary-secondary distinction in his critique of “correlationism”. Despite Meillassoux’s claim that correlationism applies to all modern philosophy since Kant, the chapter argues that Whitehead’s reworking of the primary-secondary-tertiary distinction, based in his unusual reading of Locke, avoids the correlationist charge while opening a different kind of realism. This reworking amounts to an ontological inversion of the three qualities, such that tertiary quality becomes ontologically primary. A key consequence is that “feeling,” for Whitehead, names a metaphysical process constitutive of the real. This is neither a humanist nor psychological claim, but rather a metaphysical one. The chapter closes by situating Deleuze and Guattari’s use of affect along similar lines. However, where Whitehead is largely content with a technical metaphysical result, Deleuze and Guattari explore ensuing existential possibilities in their concept of “becoming-imperceptible”.
感觉即创造:情感与第三品质
这一章着重于早期现代对初级、二级和三级素质的区分。本章首先讨论了昆汀·梅亚苏在其对“相关主义”的批判中为恢复主次区分所做的努力。尽管Meillassoux声称相关主义适用于自康德以来的所有现代哲学,但该章认为怀特黑德基于他对洛克的不同寻常的阅读,对初级-次级-三级区分进行了重新设计,避免了相关主义的指控,同时开启了一种不同的现实主义。这种改造相当于三种品质的本体论反转,这样第三品质就变成了本体论上的主要品质。一个关键的结果是,“感觉”,对怀特黑德来说,命名了一个构成现实的形而上学过程。这既不是人文主义的主张,也不是心理学的主张,而是形而上学的主张。本章以德勒兹和瓜塔里对情感的运用为结束。然而,怀特黑德在很大程度上满足于技术形而上学的结果,德勒兹和瓜塔里在他们的“变得难以察觉”的概念中探索了随之而来的存在可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信