Meat Safety: A Brief Review on Concerns Common to Science and Consumers

J. Manuel
{"title":"Meat Safety: A Brief Review on Concerns Common to Science and Consumers","authors":"J. Manuel","doi":"10.48416/IJSAF.V19I2.231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Meat safety is a multidimensional concept, and there are reasons to believe there is an information asymmetry between consumers, producers and safety authorities along the supply chain. Within this framework, this article puts together consumer concerns about meat safety, the current scientific evidence and the existing legal framework in the EU, trying to unveil possible fields for quality differentiating strategies. As such, this article does not add new data to the food safety or consumer issues fields. Rather, it allows a new perspective by associating two different research areas. Assessing the reported consumer concerns regarding meat, it is not possible to define one specific worry as more prevalent or frequent. Still, the presence of drug residues in meat is a concern often shared by consumers of several types of meat in many different European countries. Interestingly, it is also an open scientif- ic question. Research on the association between the presence of anti-bacterial residues in meat and microbial resistance is frequent. However, there is still no consensus on this subject. Still, even in the absence of such a consensus, it is a relevant issue for meat production, public health and consumer interest. Regarding the EU legal framework, the food safety legislation has accompanied scientific development, even acting preventively in questions without scientific consensus, as in the case of the use of anti-bacterials as a feed additive. Neverthe- less, even if the use of anti-bacterials in food animals is covered by several legal documents, it is still a concern for consumers. This suggests that some consumers may be interested in meat products that relieve their distrust. Therefore, there may be grounds for the development of a differention strategy, aiming at seg- ments willing to pay premiums for meat with increased guarantee of anti-bacte- rial residue control.","PeriodicalId":302742,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48416/IJSAF.V19I2.231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Meat safety is a multidimensional concept, and there are reasons to believe there is an information asymmetry between consumers, producers and safety authorities along the supply chain. Within this framework, this article puts together consumer concerns about meat safety, the current scientific evidence and the existing legal framework in the EU, trying to unveil possible fields for quality differentiating strategies. As such, this article does not add new data to the food safety or consumer issues fields. Rather, it allows a new perspective by associating two different research areas. Assessing the reported consumer concerns regarding meat, it is not possible to define one specific worry as more prevalent or frequent. Still, the presence of drug residues in meat is a concern often shared by consumers of several types of meat in many different European countries. Interestingly, it is also an open scientif- ic question. Research on the association between the presence of anti-bacterial residues in meat and microbial resistance is frequent. However, there is still no consensus on this subject. Still, even in the absence of such a consensus, it is a relevant issue for meat production, public health and consumer interest. Regarding the EU legal framework, the food safety legislation has accompanied scientific development, even acting preventively in questions without scientific consensus, as in the case of the use of anti-bacterials as a feed additive. Neverthe- less, even if the use of anti-bacterials in food animals is covered by several legal documents, it is still a concern for consumers. This suggests that some consumers may be interested in meat products that relieve their distrust. Therefore, there may be grounds for the development of a differention strategy, aiming at seg- ments willing to pay premiums for meat with increased guarantee of anti-bacte- rial residue control.
肉类安全:科学与消费者共同关注的问题综述
肉类安全是一个多维度的概念,有理由相信,在供应链上,消费者、生产者和安全当局之间存在信息不对称。在这个框架内,本文将消费者对肉类安全的担忧、当前的科学证据和欧盟现有的法律框架放在一起,试图揭示质量差异化战略的可能领域。因此,本文没有向食品安全或消费者问题领域添加新的数据。相反,它通过将两个不同的研究领域联系起来,提供了一个新的视角。评估报告中消费者对肉类的担忧,不可能确定一种特定的担忧更普遍或更频繁。尽管如此,在许多不同的欧洲国家,肉类中药物残留的存在仍然是消费者共同关注的问题。有趣的是,这也是一个开放的科学问题。肉类中抗菌残留物的存在与微生物耐药性之间的关系研究频繁。然而,在这个问题上仍然没有达成共识。然而,即使没有达成这样的共识,这对肉类生产、公共卫生和消费者利益来说也是一个相关的问题。就欧盟的法律框架而言,食品安全立法伴随着科学的发展,甚至在没有科学共识的情况下采取预防措施,例如使用抗菌剂作为饲料添加剂。尽管如此,即使在食用动物中使用抗菌剂有几份法律文件,它仍然是消费者关注的问题。这表明一些消费者可能对减轻他们不信任的肉类产品感兴趣。因此,可能有理由制定差异化战略,针对那些愿意为肉类支付溢价的细分市场,以增加抗细菌残留控制的保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信