FDA safety warnings and trends in testosterone marketing to physicians.

A. Togun, A. Sankar, P. Karaca-Mandic
{"title":"FDA safety warnings and trends in testosterone marketing to physicians.","authors":"A. Togun, A. Sankar, P. Karaca-Mandic","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2022.88841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In response to study findings showing the risk of cardiovascular adverse events associated with testosterone therapy, the FDA issued safety warnings in 2014 and modified testosterone labeling in March 2015 to indicate the increased risk of stroke and heart attack. It is unknown whether there were changes in testosterone marketing practices by pharmaceutical companies following the FDA label warning. Both primary care physicians (PCPs) and non-PCPs prescribe testosterone and are targeted by pharmaceutical marketing representatives to encourage testosterone prescribing. Likewise, pharmaceutical marketing occurs in both urban and rural areas. Our study is the first to examine testosterone marketing practices around the period of the testosterone label warning by physician specialty and rural vs urban primary care service area. In this study, we found that testosterone marketing efforts such as marketing spending per encounter, quarterly marketing spending per physician, and quarterly number of encounters per physician increased among non-PCPs and urban physicians for 4 quarters following an FDA boxed warning in 2015 on testosterone prescriptions. After the black box warning, off-label testosterone advertisements stopped. This reduction in advertising could have made it more attractive for pharmaceutical companies to increase their marketing spending targeting non-PCPs and physicians in urban areas. Understanding responses of pharmaceutical companies to FDA guidelines is important and can help inform future guideline initiatives.","PeriodicalId":267832,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of managed care","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of managed care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2022.88841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In response to study findings showing the risk of cardiovascular adverse events associated with testosterone therapy, the FDA issued safety warnings in 2014 and modified testosterone labeling in March 2015 to indicate the increased risk of stroke and heart attack. It is unknown whether there were changes in testosterone marketing practices by pharmaceutical companies following the FDA label warning. Both primary care physicians (PCPs) and non-PCPs prescribe testosterone and are targeted by pharmaceutical marketing representatives to encourage testosterone prescribing. Likewise, pharmaceutical marketing occurs in both urban and rural areas. Our study is the first to examine testosterone marketing practices around the period of the testosterone label warning by physician specialty and rural vs urban primary care service area. In this study, we found that testosterone marketing efforts such as marketing spending per encounter, quarterly marketing spending per physician, and quarterly number of encounters per physician increased among non-PCPs and urban physicians for 4 quarters following an FDA boxed warning in 2015 on testosterone prescriptions. After the black box warning, off-label testosterone advertisements stopped. This reduction in advertising could have made it more attractive for pharmaceutical companies to increase their marketing spending targeting non-PCPs and physicians in urban areas. Understanding responses of pharmaceutical companies to FDA guidelines is important and can help inform future guideline initiatives.
FDA的安全警告和向医生推销睾酮的趋势。
针对研究结果显示与睾酮治疗相关的心血管不良事件风险,FDA于2014年发布了安全警告,并于2015年3月修改了睾酮标签,以表明中风和心脏病发作的风险增加。目前尚不清楚,在FDA的标签警告之后,制药公司的睾酮营销行为是否发生了变化。初级保健医生(pcp)和非pcp都开睾酮处方,并且是药品销售代表鼓励开睾酮处方的目标。同样,医药营销在城市和农村地区都有发生。我们的研究是第一个在睾酮标签警告期间由医师专业和农村与城市初级保健服务区域检查睾酮营销实践的研究。在这项研究中,我们发现,在2015年FDA对睾酮处方发出黑框警告后,非pcp和城市医生的睾酮营销努力(如每次就诊的营销支出、每位医生的季度营销支出和每位医生的季度就诊次数)增加了4个季度。黑框警告后,标签外的睾酮广告停止了。广告的减少可能会使制药公司增加针对城市地区非pcp和医生的营销支出更具吸引力。了解制药公司对FDA指南的反应是很重要的,可以帮助告知未来的指南倡议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书